These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1286 related items for PubMed ID: 25109276

  • 41. Clinical outcome of left ventricular multipoint pacing versus conventional biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hu F, Zheng L, Ding L, Du Z, Liang E, Wu L, Chen G, Fan X, Yao Y, Jiang Y.
    Heart Fail Rev; 2018 Nov; 23(6):927-934. PubMed ID: 30209643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. A randomized double-blind crossover trial of triventricular versus biventricular pacing in heart failure.
    Rogers DP, Lambiase PD, Lowe MD, Chow AW.
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2012 May; 14(5):495-505. PubMed ID: 22312038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Left ventricular lead electrical delay predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Singh JP, Fan D, Heist EK, Alabiad CR, Taub C, Reddy V, Mansour M, Picard MH, Ruskin JN, Mela T.
    Heart Rhythm; 2006 Nov; 3(11):1285-92. PubMed ID: 17074633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Reverse ventricular remodeling and long-term survival in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization with surgically versus percutaneously placed left ventricular pacing leads.
    Rickard J, Johnston DR, Price J, Tedford R, Baranowski B, Bassiouny M, Cantillon D, Grimm RA, Tang WHW, Varma N, Wilkoff BL.
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Mar; 12(3):517-523. PubMed ID: 25460866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Right ventricular septal pacing as alternative for failed left ventricular lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates.
    Alhous MH, Small GR, Hannah A, Hillis GS, Frenneaux M, Broadhurst PA.
    Europace; 2015 Jan; 17(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 25359384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Comparison of low versus high (>40 mm Hg) pulse pressure to predict the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure (from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Trial).
    Sherazi S, Goldenberg I, Moss AJ, Solomon S, Kutyifa V, McNitt S, Shah AH, Huang DT, Aktas MK, Zareba W, Barsheshet A.
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Oct 01; 114(7):1053-8. PubMed ID: 25118116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 65.