These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

282 related items for PubMed ID: 25130299

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Pigeons' choices with token stimuli in concurrent variable-interval schedules.
    Mazur JE, Biondi DR.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Mar; 99(2):159-78. PubMed ID: 23460072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Generalized conditioned reinforcement with pigeons in a token economy.
    DeFulio A, Yankelevitz R, Bullock C, Hackenberg TD.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Jul; 102(1):26-46. PubMed ID: 24979723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The several roles of stimuli in token reinforcement.
    Bullock CE, Hackenberg TD.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Mar; 103(2):269-87. PubMed ID: 25604188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Substitution effects in a generalized token economy with pigeons.
    Andrade LF, Hackenberg TD.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jan; 107(1):123-135. PubMed ID: 28000221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Species differences between rats and pigeons in choices with probabilistic and delayed reinforcers.
    Mazur JE.
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):220-4. PubMed ID: 17343994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Reinforcer accumulation in a token-reinforcement context with pigeons.
    Yankelevitz RL, Bullock CE, Hackenberg TD.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 Nov; 90(3):283-99. PubMed ID: 19070337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Saving the best for last? A cross-species analysis of choices between reinforcer sequences.
    Andrade LF, Hackenberg TD.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Jul; 98(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 22851791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The influence of upcoming food-pellet delivery on subjects' responding for 1% sucrose reinforcement delivered by concurrent random-interval schedules.
    Weatherly JN, Grove C, Beste R.
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Apr; 134(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 17503690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Parametric analysis of delayed primary and conditioned reinforcers.
    Leon Y, Borrero JC, DeLeon IG.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Sep; 49(3):639-55. PubMed ID: 27174440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.