These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1026 related items for PubMed ID: 25134992

  • 1. Comparison of the metal-to-ceramic bond strengths of four noble alloys with press-on-metal and conventional porcelain layering techniques.
    Khmaj MR, Khmaj AB, Brantley WA, Johnston WM, Dasgupta T.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1194-200. PubMed ID: 25134992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of bond strength of a pressed ceramic fused to metal versus feldspathic porcelain fused to metal.
    Schweitzer DM, Goldstein GR, Ricci JL, Silva NR, Hittelman EL.
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 16359480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: Part 1. Comparison of shear bond strengths between different metal-resin bonding systems and a metal-ceramic system.
    Petridis H, Garefis P, Hirayama H, Kafantaris NM, Koidis PT.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003 Dec; 16(6):635-9. PubMed ID: 14714844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Shear bond strength of porcelain to a new millable alloy and a conventional castable alloy.
    Lee DH, Lee BJ, Kim SH, Lee KB.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):329-35. PubMed ID: 25681353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The influence of metal substrates and porcelains on the shade of metal-ceramic complex: a spectrophotometric study.
    Janardanan K, Pillai ST, Karunakaran H.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012 Apr; 23(6):838. PubMed ID: 23649078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effect of zinc levels in a gold-based alloy on porcelain-metal bonding.
    Asakura M, Kominami Y, Hayashi T, Tsuruta S, Kawai T.
    Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):e35-41. PubMed ID: 22418286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Repair strength of etched vs silica-coated metal-ceramic and all-ceramic restorations.
    Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Sindel J.
    Oper Dent; 2000 May; 25(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 11203818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Shear bond strengths of 2 intraoral porcelain repair systems to porcelain or metal substrates.
    Haselton DR, Diaz-Arnold AM, Dunne JT.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):526-31. PubMed ID: 11725281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of two opaquing techniques and two metal surface conditions on metal-ceramic bond strength.
    Rake PC, Goodacre CJ, Moore BK, Munoz CA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 7674194
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of interfacial variables on ceramic adherence to cast and machined commercially pure titanium.
    Sadeq A, Cai Z, Woody RD, Miller AW.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jul; 90(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 12869969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 52.