These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
123 related items for PubMed ID: 2513841
1. Effect of new bonding systems on microleakage. Swift EJ, Hansen SE. Am J Dent; 1989 Jun; 2(3):77-80. PubMed ID: 2513841 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Microleakage of Gluma Bond, Scotchbond 2 and a glass ionomer/composite sandwich technique. Reeves GW, Fitchie JG, Scarbrough AR, Hembree JH. Am J Dent; 1990 Oct; 3(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 2127533 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study: bond strength and microleakage with dentin bond systems. Tsai YH, Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Moore BK. Oper Dent; 1990 Oct; 15(2):53-60. PubMed ID: 2115676 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage with Gluma: effects of unfilled resin polymerization and storage time. Hansen SE, Swift EJ. Am J Dent; 1989 Oct; 2(5):266-8. PubMed ID: 2517873 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of composite resin on the microleakage of Scotchbond 2 and Gluma. Crim GA. Am J Dent; 1988 Oct; 1(5):215-6. PubMed ID: 3152062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanism and clinical implications of bond formation for two dentin bonding agents. Erickson RL. Am J Dent; 1989 Jul; 2 Spec No():117-23. PubMed ID: 2517773 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Third generation dentin bonding agents: a microleakage study. Scherer W, Kaim JM, Weiner E, Weiner S, Caruso J. J Esthet Dent; 1990 Jul; 2(2):33-5. PubMed ID: 2129103 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Microleakage of composite resin cores treated with various dentin bonding systems. Tjan AH, Grant BE, Dunn JR. J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jul; 66(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 1941669 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Microleakage of the Gluma system. Kanca J. Am J Dent; 1990 Jun; 3(3):105-7. PubMed ID: 2127532 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage of glass ionomer/composite resin restorations: a laboratory study. Part 2. The influence of bonding systems. Martin FE, Kingsford Smith ED, Andrews N. Aust Dent J; 1992 Jun; 37(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 1385695 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Choice of adhesive as a function of degree of mineralization of the dentin surface]. Sherman L, Goldberg M. Chir Dent Fr; 1991 Feb 07; 61(551):55-63. PubMed ID: 1900748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of GLUMA and GLUMA/Scotchbond on in vivo marginal adaptation of a composite resin to dentin. van Dijken JW, Horstedt P. Dent Mater; 1989 May 07; 5(3):165-7. PubMed ID: 2517745 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Optical and scanning electron microscope study of gingival microleakage in Class II composite restorations]. Navajas Rodríguez de Mondelo JM, González López S, Pérez Gutiérrez I. Av Odontoestomatol; 1989 Dec 07; 5(10):701-9. PubMed ID: 2517958 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A scanning electron microscopy study of dentin and enamel surfaces treated with three new resin adhesive systems. Barkmeier WW, Gwinnett AJ. Compendium; 1989 Mar 07; 10(3):145-6, 148-9, 152-3. PubMed ID: 2513124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]