These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

530 related items for PubMed ID: 25146011

  • 1. Comparison of the accuracy of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography and micro-computed tomography reconstructions by using different voxel sizes.
    Maret D, Peters OA, Galibourg A, Dumoncel J, Esclassan R, Kahn JL, Sixou M, Telmon N.
    J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1321-6. PubMed ID: 25146011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Accuracy of 3D reconstructions based on cone beam computed tomography.
    Maret D, Molinier F, Braga J, Peters OA, Telmon N, Treil J, Inglèse JM, Cossié A, Kahn JL, Sixou M.
    J Dent Res; 2010 Dec; 89(12):1465-9. PubMed ID: 20929716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of voxel size on the accuracy of 3D reconstructions with cone beam CT.
    Maret D, Telmon N, Peters OA, Lepage B, Treil J, Inglèse JM, Peyre A, Kahn JL, Sixou M.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Dec; 41(8):649-55. PubMed ID: 23166362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Assessment of automatic segmentation of teeth using a watershed-based method.
    Galibourg A, Dumoncel J, Telmon N, Calvet A, Michetti J, Maret D.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Jan; 47(1):20170220. PubMed ID: 28937285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The validity of cone-beam computed tomography in measuring root canal length using a gold standard.
    Liang YH, Jiang L, Chen C, Gao XJ, Wesselink PR, Wu MK, Shemesh H.
    J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1607-10. PubMed ID: 24238457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
    Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, Willems G.
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Validation of cone beam computed tomography as a tool to explore root canal anatomy.
    Michetti J, Maret D, Mallet JP, Diemer F.
    J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1187-90. PubMed ID: 20630296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Ex vivo detection of mandibular incisors' root canal morphology using cone-beam computed tomography with 4 different voxel sizes and micro-computed tomography.
    Bai B, Tang Y, Wu Y, Pei F, Zhu Q, Zhu P, Gu Y.
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Sep 09; 23(1):656. PubMed ID: 37689620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A new method to assess the accuracy of a Cone Beam Computed Tomography scanner by using a non-contact reverse engineering technique.
    Martorelli M, Ausiello P, Morrone R.
    J Dent; 2014 Apr 09; 42(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 24412585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Accuracy Assessment of Three-dimensional Surface Reconstructions of In vivo Teeth from Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
    Sang YH, Hu HC, Lu SH, Wu YW, Li WR, Tang ZH.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Jun 20; 129(12):1464-70. PubMed ID: 27270544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Accuracy assessment of three-dimensional surface reconstructions of teeth from cone beam computed tomography scans.
    Al-Rawi B, Hassan B, Vandenberge B, Jacobs R.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May 01; 37(5):352-8. PubMed ID: 20180895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The reliability of using postero-anterior cephalometry and cone-beam CT to determine transverse dimensions in clinical practice.
    Tai B, Goonewardene MS, Murray K, Koong B, Islam SM.
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 Nov 01; 30(2):132-42. PubMed ID: 25549515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
    González-García R, Monje F.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug 01; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT images of different voxel resolutions used to detect simulated small internal resorption cavities.
    Kamburoğlu K, Kursun S.
    Int Endod J; 2010 Sep 01; 43(9):798-807. PubMed ID: 20609023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Accuracy of volumetric measurement of simulated root resorption lacunas based on cone beam computed tomography.
    Wang Y, He S, Guo Y, Wang S, Chen S.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2013 Aug 01; 16(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 23419069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Accuracy of in vitro mandibular volumetric measurements from CBCT of different voxel sizes with different segmentation threshold settings.
    Dong T, Xia L, Cai C, Yuan L, Ye N, Fang B.
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Sep 04; 19(1):206. PubMed ID: 31484529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: a useful tool for dental age estimation?
    Maret D, Peters OA, Dedouit F, Telmon N, Sixou M.
    Med Hypotheses; 2011 May 04; 76(5):700-2. PubMed ID: 21345598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of in vivo 3D cone-beam computed tomography tooth volume measurement protocols.
    Forst D, Nijjar S, Flores-Mir C, Carey J, Secanell M, Lagravere M.
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Dec 23; 15(1):69. PubMed ID: 25534123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Quantification of tooth displacement from cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Chen J, Li S, Fang S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep 23; 136(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 19732674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Detection accuracy of proximal caries by phosphor plate and cone-beam computerized tomography images scanned with different resolutions.
    Cheng JG, Zhang ZL, Wang XY, Zhang ZY, Ma XC, Li G.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug 23; 16(4):1015-21. PubMed ID: 21805053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.