These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. False-negative rate of combined mammography and ultrasound for women with palpable breast masses. Chan CH, Coopey SB, Freer PE, Hughes KS. Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 153(3):699-702. PubMed ID: 26341750 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic value of breast ultrasound in mammography BI-RADS 0 and clinically indeterminate or suspicious of malignancy breast lesions. Dobrosavljević A, Rakić S, Nikoli B, Raznatović SJ, Dikić SD, Milosević Z, Jurisić A, Skrobić M. Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Mar; 73(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 27295907 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification in 51 excised palpable pediatric breast masses. Koning JL, Davenport KP, Poole PS, Kruk PG, Grabowski JE. J Pediatr Surg; 2015 Oct; 50(10):1746-50. PubMed ID: 25783351 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Does power Doppler ultrasonography improve the BI-RADS category assessment and diagnostic accuracy of solid breast lesions? Tozaki M, Fukuma E. Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep 01; 52(7):706-10. PubMed ID: 21596798 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS. Heinig J, Witteler R, Schmitz R, Kiesel L, Steinhard J. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep 01; 32(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 18421795 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Downgrading and Upgrading Gray-Scale Ultrasound BI-RADS Categories of Benign and Malignant Masses With Optoacoustics: A Pilot Study. Neuschler EI, Lavin PT, Tucker FL, Barke LD, Bertrand ML, Böhm-Vélez M, Destounis S, Dogan BE, Grobmyer SR, Katzen J, Kist KA, Makariou EV, Parris TM, Young CA, Butler R. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep 01; 211(3):689-700. PubMed ID: 29975115 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]