These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

271 related items for PubMed ID: 25151294

  • 21. Ultrasound positive predictive values by BI-RADS categories 3-5 for solid masses: An independent reader study.
    Stavros AT, Freitas AG, deMello GGN, Barke L, McDonald D, Kaske T, Wolverton D, Honick A, Stanzani D, Padovan AH, Moura APC, de Campos MCV.
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Oct; 27(10):4307-4315. PubMed ID: 28396996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Downgrading of Breast Masses Suspicious for Cancer by Using Optoacoustic Breast Imaging.
    Menezes GLG, Pijnappel RM, Meeuwis C, Bisschops R, Veltman J, Lavin PT, van de Vijver MJ, Mann RM.
    Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):355-365. PubMed ID: 29664342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Palpable breast masses with probably benign morphology at sonography: can biopsy be deferred?
    Park YM, Kim EK, Lee JH, Ryu JH, Han SS, Choi SJ, Lee SJ, Yoon HK.
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1104-11. PubMed ID: 18855166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Recall rate of screening ultrasound with automated breast volumetric scanning (ABVS) in women with dense breasts: a first quarter experience.
    Arleo EK, Saleh M, Ionescu D, Drotman M, Min RJ, Hentel K.
    Clin Imaging; 2014 Dec; 38(4):439-444. PubMed ID: 24768327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. [Neddle-guided biopsy in the diagnosis of non-palpable breast cancer].
    Becerra-Alcántara GI, Círigo-Villagómez LL, Ramos-Medina F, Robledo-Martínez H, Mar-Merinos CG, Panzi-Altamirano RM.
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2015 Jul; 83(7):400-7. PubMed ID: 26422910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
    Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koelliker SL, Livingston LS.
    Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Value of the US BI-RADS final assessment following mastectomy: BI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions.
    Gweon HM, Son EJ, Youk JH, Kim JA, Chung J.
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr 01; 53(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 22302210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Predictive value for malignancy of suspicious breast masses of BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 using ultrasound elastography and MR diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Satake H, Nishio A, Ikeda M, Ishigaki S, Shimamoto K, Hirano M, Naganawa S.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan 01; 196(1):202-9. PubMed ID: 21178068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Imaging and Histopathologic Features of BI-RADS 3 Lesions Upgraded during Imaging Surveillance.
    Michaels A, Chung CS, Birdwell RL, Frost EP, Giess CS.
    Breast J; 2017 Jan 01; 23(1):10-16. PubMed ID: 27612001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. ShearWave™ Elastography BE1 multinational breast study: additional SWE™ features support potential to downgrade BI-RADS®-3 lesions.
    Schäfer FK, Hooley RJ, Ohlinger R, Hahne U, Madjar H, Svensson WE, Balu-Maestro C, Juhan V, Athanasiou A, Mundinger A, Order B, Locatelli M, Cosgrove D, Wolf OJ, Henry JP, Moutfi M, Gay JM, Cohen-Bacrie C.
    Ultraschall Med; 2013 Jun 01; 34(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 23709241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features.
    Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Apr 01; 184(4):1260-5. PubMed ID: 15788607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. [The value of ultrasound classification in BI-RADS category 4 of breast complex cystic masses].
    Yao JP, Niu LJ, Wang Y, Geng CY, Chang Q, Chen Y, Zhu L.
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Sep 23; 40(9):672-675. PubMed ID: 30293391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Short-term follow-up of palpable breast lesions with benign imaging features: evaluation of 375 lesions in 320 women.
    Harvey JA, Nicholson BT, Lorusso AP, Cohen MA, Bovbjerg VE.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec 23; 193(6):1723-30. PubMed ID: 19933671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Benign papilloma without atypia diagnosed at US-guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy: clinical and US features predictive of upgrade to malignancy.
    Youk JH, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Son EJ, Park BW, Kim SI.
    Radiology; 2011 Jan 23; 258(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 20971773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
    Wenkel E, Heckmann M, Heinrich M, Schwab SA, Uder M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Bautz WA, Janka R.
    Rofo; 2008 Sep 23; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Probably Benign Solid Breast Lesions on Ultrasound: Need for Biopsy Reassessed.
    Fatima K, Masroor I, Khanani S.
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Dec 25; 19(12):3467-3471. PubMed ID: 30583671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Downgrading Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories in ultrasound using strain elastography and computer-aided diagnosis system: a multicenter, prospective study.
    Du Y, Ma J, Wu T, Li F, Pan J, Du L, Zhang M, Diao X, Wu R.
    Br J Radiol; 2024 Oct 01; 97(1162):1653-1660. PubMed ID: 39102827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Breast mass characterization using shear wave elastography and ultrasound.
    Hari S, Paul SB, Vidyasagar R, Dhamija E, Adarsh AD, Thulkar S, Mathur S, Sreenivas V, Sharma S, Srivastava A, Seenu V, Prashad R.
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2018 Nov 01; 99(11):699-707. PubMed ID: 30006125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Assessment of Ultrasound Features and BI-RADS Categories of Malignant Breast Masses in Women ≤40.
    Gity M, Jafari M, Olfatbakhsh A, Rezaei Kalantari K, Hashemi E, Sari F.
    Arch Iran Med; 2021 May 01; 24(5):383-389. PubMed ID: 34196203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. A Pivotal Study of Optoacoustic Imaging to Diagnose Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A New Evaluation Tool for Radiologists.
    Neuschler EI, Butler R, Young CA, Barke LD, Bertrand ML, Böhm-Vélez M, Destounis S, Donlan P, Grobmyer SR, Katzen J, Kist KA, Lavin PT, Makariou EV, Parris TM, Schilling KJ, Tucker FL, Dogan BE.
    Radiology; 2018 May 01; 287(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 29178816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.