These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

197 related items for PubMed ID: 25153284

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of polyetheretherketone and titanium cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy.
    Thien A, King NK, Ang BT, Wang E, Ng I.
    World Neurosurg; 2015 Feb; 83(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 24909393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Outcomes following polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cranioplasty: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Punchak M, Chung LK, Lagman C, Bui TT, Lazareff J, Rezzadeh K, Jarrahy R, Yang I.
    J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 41():30-35. PubMed ID: 28377284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Is Polyetheretherketone an Effective Alloplastic Material in Comparison to Titanium in Calvarial Reconstruction.
    McGinnity-Hamze G, Hatamleh MM.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jul; 35(5):1517-1522. PubMed ID: 38814081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Cranioplasty with customized titanium and PEEK implants in a mechanical stress model.
    Lethaus B, Safi Y, ter Laak-Poort M, Kloss-Brandstätter A, Banki F, Robbenmenke C, Steinseifer U, Kessler P.
    J Neurotrauma; 2012 Apr 10; 29(6):1077-83. PubMed ID: 22017579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison between the different types of heterologous materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review of the literature.
    Morselli C, Zaed I, Tropeano MP, Cataletti G, Iaccarino C, Rossini Z, Servadei F.
    J Neurosurg Sci; 2019 Dec 10; 63(6):723-736. PubMed ID: 31599560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A Large Multicenter Retrospective Research on Embedded Cranioplasty and Covered Cranioplasty.
    Zhang Q, Yuan Y, Li X, Sun T, Zhou Y, Yu H, Guan J.
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Apr 10; 112():e645-e651. PubMed ID: 29374612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Discussion of Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With PEEK Versus Titanium Cranioplasty Reconstruction.
    Mitchell KA, Gordon C.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Apr 10; 32(1):198-200. PubMed ID: 33235163
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.