These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

778 related items for PubMed ID: 25162244

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
    Chun YS, Sinha I, Turko A, Yueh JH, Lipsitz S, Pribaz JJ, Lee BT.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 20555301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Double pedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction.
    Agarwal JP, Gottlieb LJ.
    Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Apr; 58(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 17413875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Multicenter Comparison of Four Abdominally Based Autologous Reconstruction Methods.
    Macadam SA, Zhong T, Weichman K, Papsdorf M, Lennox PA, Hazen A, Matros E, Disa J, Mehrara B, Pusic AL.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 137(3):758-771. PubMed ID: 26910656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [The DIEP Flap as Method of Choice in Breast Reconstruction - Results and Protocol for Succesful Reconstruction].
    Otte M, Andree C, Hagouan M, Richrath P, Abu-Ghazaleh A, Munder B.
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2015 Aug; 47(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 26287324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Analysis of complications and patient satisfaction in pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction.
    Momoh AO, Colakoglu S, Westvik TS, Curtis MS, Yueh JH, de Blacam C, Tobias AM, Lee BT.
    Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Jul; 69(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 21659842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.
    Garvey PB, Buchel EW, Pockaj BA, Casey WJ, Gray RJ, Hernández JL, Samson TD.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1711-9; discussion 1720-1. PubMed ID: 16651940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Meta-analysis of flap perfusion and donor site complications for breast reconstruction using pedicled versus free TRAM and DIEP flaps.
    Jeong W, Lee S, Kim J.
    Breast; 2018 Apr; 38():45-51. PubMed ID: 29227815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Muscle sparing-2 transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction: a comparison with deep inferior epigastric perforator flap.
    Takeishi M, Fujimoto M, Ishida K, Makino Y.
    Microsurgery; 2008 Apr; 28(8):650-5. PubMed ID: 18844226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 39.