These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

297 related items for PubMed ID: 25167217

  • 1. Impact of modulating phase duration on electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses obtained during cochlear implantation.
    Bonne NX, Douchement D, Hosana G, Desruelles J, Fayoux P, Ruzza I, Vincent C.
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 May; 16(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 25167217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
    Thai-Van H, Cozma S, Boutitie F, Disant F, Truy E, Collet L.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of increasing duration of stimulation on the electrically evoked auditory brainstem and middle latency responses in pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Davids T, Valero J, Papsin BC, Harrison RV, Gordon KA.
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 19128593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Prognostic value of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in cochlear implantation.
    Lundin K, Stillesjö F, Rask-Andersen H.
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16(5):254-61. PubMed ID: 25798647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Measurement of electrical evoked middle latency response in cochlear implantation operation].
    Wang B, Cao KL, Wang Y, Lu Y.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 47(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 22805019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response.
    Firszt JB, Chambers RD, Kraus And N, Reeder RM.
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? Part 2: On electrically evoked late auditory responses.
    Guiraud J, Gallego S, Arnold L, Boyle P, Truy E, Collet L.
    Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):44-57. PubMed ID: 17350776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? (1): On electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses.
    Guiraud J, Gallego S, Arnold L, Boyle P, Truy E, Collet L.
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):48-60. PubMed ID: 17157463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. EABR measurements during cochlear implantation in one-year-old, infant, child, adult, and elderly patients.
    Enomoto C, Minami S, Kaga K.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2021 Jan; 141(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 33146057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Changes in electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Deniz B, Kara E, Polat Z, Deniz R, Ataş A.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Feb; 141():110555. PubMed ID: 33333339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Quantitative analysis of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in implanted children with auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony.
    Runge-Samuelson CL, Drake S, Wackym PA.
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 18025997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Electrophysiological characteristics of EABR and its value assessment of cochlear implant].
    Wang Y, Pan T, Zhou N, Ma F.
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 27(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 23646423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. An evoked potential study of the developmental time course of the auditory nerve and brainstem in children using cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006 Jan; 11(1):7-23. PubMed ID: 16219994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Auditory brainstem activity in children with 9-30 months of bilateral cochlear implant use.
    Gordon KA, Valero J, Papsin BC.
    Hear Res; 2007 Nov; 233(1-2):97-107. PubMed ID: 17850999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Relationships between bilateral auditory brainstem activity and inter-implant interval in children with cochlear implants.
    Wu YL, Chen L, Zhu HY, Luo WY, Shi K, Hou XY, Sun JW, Sun JQ, Guo XT.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Apr; 281(4):1735-1743. PubMed ID: 37924365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Electrophysiologic and behavioral outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with auditory nerve hypoplasia.
    Valero J, Blaser S, Papsin BC, James AL, Gordon KA.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Apr; 33(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 21750462
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Extracochlear Stimulation of Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (eABRs) Remains the Preferred Pre-implant Auditory Nerve Function Test in an Assessor-blinded Comparison.
    Causon A, O'Driscoll M, Stapleton E, Lloyd S, Freeman S, Munro KJ.
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jan; 40(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 30489452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A Cochlear Implant Performance Prognostic Test Based on Electrical Field Interactions Evaluated by eABR (Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses).
    Guevara N, Hoen M, Truy E, Gallego S.
    PLoS One; 2016 Jan; 11(5):e0155008. PubMed ID: 27149268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.