These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

120 related items for PubMed ID: 2517745

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Influence of eugenol-containing temporary cement on efficacy of dentin-bonding systems.
    Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1999 Feb; 107(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 10102752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Bonding of dentin adhesives in clinically-simulated occlusal resin composite restorations.
    Terkla LG, Mitchem JC, Mahler DB.
    Am J Dent; 1991 Oct; 4(5):214-8. PubMed ID: 1810329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of three dentin adhesives on marginal adaptation of two light-cured composites.
    Hansen EK.
    Scand J Dent Res; 1986 Feb; 94(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 2939544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Dentin-dentinal adhesive interaction. Calorimetric measurement].
    Angelini E, Pezzoli M, Zucchi F.
    Dent Cadmos; 1990 Feb 15; 58(2):30-2, 35-6. PubMed ID: 2118459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Microleakage of Gluma Bond, Scotchbond 2 and a glass ionomer/composite sandwich technique.
    Reeves GW, Fitchie JG, Scarbrough AR, Hembree JH.
    Am J Dent; 1990 Oct 15; 3(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 2127533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Adhesion to dentin by means of Gluma resin.
    Asmussen E, Antonucci JM, Bowen RL.
    Scand J Dent Res; 1988 Dec 15; 96(6):584-9. PubMed ID: 3144733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations using different restorative techniques.
    Krejci I, Lutz F.
    J Dent; 1991 Feb 15; 19(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 1901872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Dentin-polymer bond established by Gluma and tested by thermal stress.
    Munksgaard EC, Irie M.
    Scand J Dent Res; 1987 Apr 15; 95(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 3105043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Microleakage of composite resin cores treated with various dentin bonding systems.
    Tjan AH, Grant BE, Dunn JR.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jul 15; 66(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 1941669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Inhibition of bacterial growth under composite restorations following GLUMA pretreatment.
    Felton D, Bergenholtz G, Cox CF.
    J Dent Res; 1989 Mar 15; 68(3):491-5. PubMed ID: 2493491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparative study: bond strength and microleakage with dentin bond systems.
    Tsai YH, Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Moore BK.
    Oper Dent; 1990 Mar 15; 15(2):53-60. PubMed ID: 2115676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Five-year study of cervical erosions restored with resin and dentin-bonding agent.
    Hansen EK.
    Scand J Dent Res; 1992 Aug 15; 100(4):244-7. PubMed ID: 1439532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of Gluma bond strength to primary vs. permanent teeth.
    Salama FS, Tao L.
    Pediatr Dent; 1991 Aug 15; 13(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 1909025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.