These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

233 related items for PubMed ID: 2518367

  • 41. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S, Tveit AB, Gaarden T, Sandvik L, Espelid I.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Re-establishing occlusal anatomy: a new technique for direct tooth coloured restorations.
    Liebenberg WH.
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1995 Oct; 50(10):475-81. PubMed ID: 8613576
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. The use of a glass ionomer cement in the treatment of initial carious lesions.
    Burke FJ.
    Dent Update; 1989 Oct; 16(6):257-9. PubMed ID: 2639114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) and silver amalgam restorations in the treatment of Class 5 caries in xerostomic head and neck cancer patients.
    Wood RE, Maxymiw WG, McComb D.
    Oper Dent; 1993 Oct; 18(3):94-102. PubMed ID: 8415169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Alternatives to silver amalgam and resin composite in pediatric dentistry.
    Croll TP.
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Nov; 29(11):697-703. PubMed ID: 10200719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. A comparative study of plaque mutans streptococci levels in children receiving glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Ertuğrul F, Eltem R, Eronat C.
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003 Nov; 70(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 12762601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement restoration of posterior teeth with proximal carious lesions.
    Morand JM, Jonas P.
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Jun; 26(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 8602418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. [Bonding of visible light cured composite resins to glass ionomer and Cermet cements].
    Kakaboura A, Vougiouklakis G.
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1990 Apr; 44(2):107-15. PubMed ID: 2130320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Clinical applications of glass-ionomer cements.
    McLean JW.
    Oper Dent; 1992 Apr; Suppl 5():184-90. PubMed ID: 1470548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Cuspal reinforcement in primary teeth: an in vitro comparison of three restorative materials.
    Donly KJ, Wild T, Jensen ME.
    Pediatr Dent; 1988 Jun; 10(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 2978625
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E, Zhang L, Hickel R, Bossù M, Polimeni A, Ferrari M.
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom.
    Burke FJ, Cheung SW, Mjör IA, Wilson NH.
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results.
    Busato AL, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Carrilho MR.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):304-8. PubMed ID: 11803995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a 3-year clinical study.
    Svanberg M.
    Caries Res; 1992 Oct; 26(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 1423449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Artificial caries formation around fluoride-releasing restorations in roots.
    Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Papadogiannis Y, Konstantinidis A.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Nov; 25(11):814-20. PubMed ID: 9846901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Mutans streptococci in interproximal plaque from amalgam and glass ionomer restorations.
    Svanberg M, Krasse B, Ornerfeldt HO.
    Caries Res; 1990 Nov; 24(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 2111222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Comparison of antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam in class two restorations by Streptococcus mutans count analysis at fixed intervals: an in vivo study.
    Tegginmani VS, Goel B, Uppin V, Horatti P, Kumar LS, Nainani A.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May 01; 14(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 24171977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Five-year study of Class II restorations in permanent teeth using amalgam, glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cerment and resin-based composite materials.
    Mjör IA, Jokstad A.
    J Dent; 1993 Dec 01; 21(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 8258583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.