These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

504 related items for PubMed ID: 25190410

  • 1. Detection threshold for sound distortion resulting from noise reduction in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Brons I, Dreschler WA, Houben R.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1375. PubMed ID: 25190410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J, Hu H, Zheng C, Li G, Lutman ME, Bleeck S.
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
    D'Aquila LA, Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD.
    Trends Hear; 2017 Sep; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O, Pentony S, Kalluri S, Edwards B.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1419-32. PubMed ID: 24606279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of single-microphone noise reduction schemes: can hearing impaired listeners tell the difference?
    Huber R, Bisitz T, Gerkmann T, Kiessling J, Meister H, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S55-S61. PubMed ID: 28112001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V, Makashay MJ, Theodoroff SM, Leek MR.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability.
    Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD, Perez ZD, D'Aquila LA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4452. PubMed ID: 28679277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Saripella R, Loizou PC, Thibodeau L, Alford JA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
    Koelewijn T, Versfeld NJ, Kramer SE.
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.
    Christiansen C, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1655-66. PubMed ID: 22978894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
    Anderson MC, Arehart KH, Kates JM.
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of companding on speech recognition in quiet and noise for listeners with ANSD.
    Narne VK, Barman A, Deepthi M.
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 24237041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Better-ear glimpsing in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Best V, Mason CR, Kidd G, Iyer N, Brungart DS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):EL213-9. PubMed ID: 25698053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T, Laugesen S, Jensen NS, Kragelund L.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D, Ahlstrom JB, Bologna WJ, Dubno JR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J, Hu H, Zheng C, Li G, Lutman ME, Bleeck S.
    Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Healy EW, Yoho SE, Wang Y, Wang D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3029-38. PubMed ID: 24116438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The binaural intelligibility level difference in hearing-impaired listeners: the role of supra-threshold deficits.
    Goverts ST, Houtgast T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3073-84. PubMed ID: 21117756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.