These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
166 related items for PubMed ID: 25209040
1. Amplitude variation in calibrated audiometer systems in clinical simulations. Barlow C, Davison L, Ashmore M, Weinstein R. Noise Health; 2014; 16(72):299-305. PubMed ID: 25209040 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability. Lapsley Miller JA, Reed CM, Robinson SR, Perez ZD. Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Application of auditory brainstem response (ABR) and 40 Hz auditory event related potential (40 Hz AERP) to the diagnosis of occupational noise-induced hearing impairment]. Xia YJ, Hao FT, Wang CY, Li JL, Fu X. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 30(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 22804888 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficient hearing screening in noise-exposed listeners using the digit triplet test. Jansen S, Luts H, Dejonckere P, van Wieringen A, Wouters J. Ear Hear; 2013 Mar; 34(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 23782715 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting the degree of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening. Baldwin M, Watkin P. Ear Hear; 2013 Mar; 34(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 23340456 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL. Moore BC, Glasberg BR, Stone MA. Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):478-87. PubMed ID: 15599194 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery. Convery E, Keidser G, Seeto M, Freeston K, Zhou D, Dillon H. Ear Hear; 2014 Oct; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Advantages with a new Bekesy audiometer in the measurement of noise induced hearing loss. Ivarsson A, Erlandsson B, Håkanson H, Nilsson P. Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):265-72. PubMed ID: 6939097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity of diagnostic pure-tone audiometry without a sound-treated environment in older adults. Maclennan-Smith F, Swanepoel de W, Hall JW. Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):66-73. PubMed ID: 23140522 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An assessment of threshold shifts in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians using conventional and extended high-frequency audiometry. Schmuziger N, Patscheke J, Probst R. Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):643-8. PubMed ID: 17804978 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Hearing Tests Based on Biologically Calibrated Mobile Devices: Comparison With Pure-Tone Audiometry. Masalski M, Grysiński T, Kręcicki T. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2018 Jan 10; 6(1):e10. PubMed ID: 29321124 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry. Wong LL, Cheung C, Wong EC. Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun 10; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]