These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

179 related items for PubMed ID: 25210336

  • 21. Anatomical and morphometrical evaluation of the jugular tubercle.
    Suslu HT, Gayretli O, Coskun O, Bozbuga M, Serifoglu L, Gurses IA.
    Br J Neurosurg; 2014 Aug; 28(4):503-6. PubMed ID: 24635526
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Far lateral transcondylar approach: dimensional anatomy.
    Dowd GC, Zeiller S, Awasthi D.
    Neurosurgery; 1999 Jul; 45(1):95-9; discussion 99-100. PubMed ID: 10414571
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The Forgotten Intermediate Condylar Canal: Anatomic Study with Application to Skull Base Surgery.
    Smith WL, Pękala PA, Iwanaga J, Loukas M, Dumont AS, Walocha J, Tubbs RS.
    World Neurosurg; 2022 May; 161():e75-e79. PubMed ID: 35033691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [Comparison of the far lateral approach, transcondylar fossa approach, and transcondylar approach using a three-dimensional skull base model with artificial vertebral artery].
    Mori K, Yamamoto T, Nakao Y, Esaki T.
    No Shinkei Geka; 2010 Mar; 38(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 20229769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Anatomical determination of a safe entry point for occipital condyle screw using three-dimensional landmarks.
    Ozer MA, Celik S, Govsa F, Ulusoy MO.
    Eur Spine J; 2011 Sep; 20(9):1510-7. PubMed ID: 21416278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Quantitative analysis of variants of the far-lateral approach: condylar fossa and transcondylar exposures.
    Wu A, Zabramski JM, Jittapiromsak P, Wallace RC, Spetzler RF, Preul MC.
    Neurosurgery; 2010 Jun; 66(6 Suppl Operative):191-8; discussion 198. PubMed ID: 20489505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. A morphometric anatomical and comparative study of the foramen magnum region in a Greek population.
    Natsis K, Piagkou M, Skotsimara G, Piagkos G, Skandalakis P.
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2013 Dec; 35(10):925-34. PubMed ID: 23620089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Anatomical Variation in Morphometry and Morphology of the Foramen Magnum and Occipital Condyle in Dried Adult Skulls.
    Degno S, Abrha M, Asmare Y, Muche A.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 30(1):256-259. PubMed ID: 30480625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Morphometric analysis of hypoglossal canal of the occipital bone in Iranian dry skulls.
    Parvindokht B, Reza DM, Saeid B.
    J Craniovertebr Junction Spine; 2015 Jan; 6(3):111-4. PubMed ID: 26288545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Trajectory of the hypoglossal nerve in the hypoglossal canal: significance for the transcondylar approach.
    Katsuta T, Matsushima T, Wen HT, Rhoton AL.
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2000 Apr; 40(4):206-9; discussion 210. PubMed ID: 10853319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. [Anterolateral extension of the lateral suboccipital approach: an anatomical study].
    Silveira RL, Gusmao S.
    Arq Neuropsiquiatr; 2002 Jun; 60(2-A):251-7. PubMed ID: 12068355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. The Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to the Hypoglossal Canal: The Role of the Eustachian Tube as a Landmark for Dissection.
    Sreenath SB, Recinos PF, McClurg SW, Thorp BD, McKinney KA, Klatt-Cromwell C, Zanation AM.
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Oct; 141(10):927-33. PubMed ID: 26378612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Feasibility of occipital condyle screw placement for occipitocervical fixation: a cadaveric study and description of a novel technique.
    Uribe JS, Ramos E, Vale F.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Dec; 21(8):540-6. PubMed ID: 19057245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Morphometric Analysis of the Occipital Condyle and Its Surgical Importance.
    Saluja S, Das SS, Vasudeva N.
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Nov; 10(11):AC01-AC04. PubMed ID: 28050351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Jugular foramen versus hypoglossal canal in axial CT scan.
    Mohammadzadeh M, Erfanian R, Rezaeian S, Batavani N, Amirzargar B.
    Biomedicine (Taipei); 2023 Nov; 13(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 37168727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Anatomic study on the design of far-lateral transcondylar transtubercular keyhole approach assisted by neuro-navigation].
    Zhang HZ, Lan Q.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Mar 21; 86(11):736-9. PubMed ID: 16681945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Morphological analysis and morphometry of the foramen magnum: an anatomical investigation.
    Chethan P, Prakash KG, Murlimanju BV, Prashanth KU, Prabhu LV, Saralaya VV, Krishnamurthy A, Somesh MS, Kumar CG.
    Turk Neurosurg; 2012 Mar 21; 22(4):416-9. PubMed ID: 22843456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Occipital condyle morphometry and incidence of condylus tertius: phylogenetic and clinical significance.
    Saralaya VV, Murlimanju BV, Vaderav R, Tonse M, Prameela MD, Jiji PJ.
    Clin Ter; 2012 Nov 21; 163(6):479-82. PubMed ID: 23306741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. The microsurgical anatomy of the hypoglossal canal.
    Karasu A, Cansever T, Batay F, Sabanci PA, Al-Mefty O.
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2009 Jun 21; 31(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 19148566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Morphometric analysis of occipital condyles using alternative imaging technique.
    Gumussoy I, Duman SB.
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2020 Feb 21; 42(2):161-169. PubMed ID: 31549198
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.