These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

91 related items for PubMed ID: 2521129

  • 1. Impact of postprocessing on the detection of simulated pulmonary nodules with digital radiography.
    Oestmann JW, Rubens JR, Bourgouin PM, Rhea JT, Llewellyn HJ, Greene R.
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Jun; 24(6):467-71. PubMed ID: 2521129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Screening for tracheobronchial diseases with digital storage phosphor radiography].
    Kamimura R.
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Mar 25; 52(3):308-19. PubMed ID: 1579427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Selenium-based digital radiography versus high-resolution storage phosphor radiography in the detection of solitary pulmonary nodules without calcification: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
    Awai K, Komi M, Hori S.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov 25; 177(5):1141-4. PubMed ID: 11641189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Digital radiography: optimization of chest radiographs using a modified exposure control].
    Reichelt S, Oestmann JW, Prokop M, Hagemann G, Knüpfer W, Galanski M.
    Rofo; 1991 Feb 25; 154(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 1847538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Diagnostic performance of a prototype dual-energy chest imaging system ROC analysis.
    Kashani H, Varon CA, Paul NS, Gang GJ, Van Metter R, Yorkston J, Siewerdsen JH.
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar 25; 17(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 20042351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions.
    Schaefer-Prokop CM, Prokop M, Schmidt A, Neitzel U, Galanski M.
    Radiology; 1996 Oct 25; 201(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8816519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Conventional chest radiography vs dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules.
    Kelcz F, Zink FE, Peppler WW, Kruger DG, Ergun DL, Mistretta CA.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb 25; 162(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 8310908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Experimental evaluation of a portable indirect flat-panel detector for the pediatric chest: comparison with storage phosphor radiography at different exposures by using a chest phantom.
    Rapp-Bernhardt U, Bernhardt TM, Lenzen H, Esseling R, Roehl FW, Schiborr M, Theobald-Hormann I, Heindel W.
    Radiology; 2005 Nov 25; 237(2):485-91. PubMed ID: 16170012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.