These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

248 related items for PubMed ID: 25234995

  • 1. On the near non-existence of "pure" energetic masking release for speech.
    Stone MA, Moore BC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):1967-77. PubMed ID: 25234995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Notionally steady background noise acts primarily as a modulation masker of speech.
    Stone MA, Füllgrabe C, Moore BC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jul; 132(1):317-26. PubMed ID: 22779480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: II. Fluctuating noise.
    Smits C, Festen JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3004-15. PubMed ID: 23654404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Psychometric functions for sentence recognition in sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises.
    Shen Y, Manzano NK, Richards VM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3613-24. PubMed ID: 26723318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.
    Francart T, van Wieringen A, Wouters J.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
    Hochmuth S, Kollmeier B, Brand T, Jürgens T.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 May; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The near non-existence of "pure" energetic masking release for speech: Extension to spectro-temporal modulation and glimpsing.
    Stone MA, Canavan S.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):832. PubMed ID: 27586715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers.
    Yost WA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2093. PubMed ID: 28372135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Set-size procedures for controlling variations in speech-reception performance with a fluctuating masker.
    Bernstein JG, Summers V, Iyer N, Brungart DS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2676-89. PubMed ID: 23039460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Festen JM, Kramer SE.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Oct; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
    Gnansia D, Jourdes V, Lorenzi C.
    Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Characterizing the Speech Reception Threshold in hearing-impaired listeners in relation to masker type and masker level.
    Rhebergen KS, Pool RE, Dreschler WA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1491-505. PubMed ID: 24606285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The effect of nearby maskers on speech intelligibility in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A, Buchholz JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2214. PubMed ID: 28372143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.
    Christiansen C, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1655-66. PubMed ID: 22978894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise.
    Füllgrabe C, Berthommier F, Lorenzi C.
    Hear Res; 2006 Jan; 211(1-2):74-84. PubMed ID: 16289579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: effect of masker type.
    Deroche ML, Culling JF.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL465-70. PubMed ID: 24181992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR, Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.