These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

186 related items for PubMed ID: 25256160

  • 1. Body size matters for aposematic prey during predator aversion learning.
    Smith KE, Halpin CG, Rowe C.
    Behav Processes; 2014 Nov; 109 Pt B():173-9. PubMed ID: 25256160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Better the devil you know: avian predators find variation in prey toxicity aversive.
    Barnett CA, Bateson M, Rowe C.
    Biol Lett; 2014 Nov; 10(11):20140533. PubMed ID: 25392317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Predators' toxin burdens influence their strategic decisions to eat toxic prey.
    Skelhorn J, Rowe C.
    Curr Biol; 2007 Sep 04; 17(17):1479-83. PubMed ID: 17716896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The benefits of being toxic to deter predators depends on prey body size.
    Smith KE, Halpin CG, Rowe C.
    Behav Ecol; 2016 Sep 04; 27(6):1650-1655. PubMed ID: 28028378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Increased predation of nutrient-enriched aposematic prey.
    Halpin CG, Skelhorn J, Rowe C.
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Apr 22; 281(1781):20133255. PubMed ID: 24598424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Birds learn to avoid aposematic prey by using the appearance of host plants.
    McLellan CF, Scott-Samuel NE, Cuthill IC.
    Curr Biol; 2021 Dec 06; 31(23):5364-5369.e4. PubMed ID: 34624210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Avian predators taste-reject aposematic prey on the basis of their chemical defence.
    Skelhorn J, Rowe C.
    Biol Lett; 2006 Sep 22; 2(3):348-50. PubMed ID: 17148400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Avian predators taste reject mimetic prey in relation to their signal reliability.
    He R, Pagani-Núñez E, Goodale E, Barnett CRA.
    Sci Rep; 2022 Feb 11; 12(1):2334. PubMed ID: 35149707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Strong antiapostatic selection against novel rare aposematic prey.
    Lindström L, Alatalo RV, Lyytinen A, Mappes J.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Jul 31; 98(16):9181-4. PubMed ID: 11459937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Social transmission of avoidance among predators facilitates the spread of novel prey.
    Thorogood R, Kokko H, Mappes J.
    Nat Ecol Evol; 2018 Feb 31; 2(2):254-261. PubMed ID: 29255302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Avian predators attack aposematic prey more forcefully when they are part of an aggregation.
    Skelhorn J, Ruxton GD.
    Biol Lett; 2006 Dec 22; 2(4):488-90. PubMed ID: 17148269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evidence for a peak-shift in predator generalization among aposematic prey.
    Gamberale G, Tullberg BS.
    Proc Biol Sci; 1996 Oct 22; 263(1375):1329-34. PubMed ID: 8914330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.