These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

155 related items for PubMed ID: 25264550

  • 1. Microleakage of inlay ceramic systems luted with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Uludag B, Yucedag E, Sahin V.
    J Adhes Dent; 2014 Dec; 16(6):523-9. PubMed ID: 25264550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Microleakage of IPS empress 2 inlay restorations luted with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Cal E, Celik EU, Turkun M.
    Oper Dent; 2012 Dec; 37(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 22360365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements.
    Mota CS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM.
    J Adhes Dent; 2003 Dec; 5(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12729085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B, Ozturk O, Ozturk AN.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Microleakage of all-ceramic crowns using self-etching resin luting agents.
    Trajtenberg CP, Caram SJ, Kiat-amnuay S.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Oct; 33(4):392-9. PubMed ID: 18666496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Adhesion of indirect MOD resin composite inlays luted with self-adhesive and self-etching resin cements.
    Inukai T, Abe T, Ito Y, Pilecki P, Wilson RF, Watson TF, Foxton RM.
    Oper Dent; 2012 Oct; 37(5):474-84. PubMed ID: 22360367
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Analysis of marginal adaptation and sealing to enamel and dentin of four self-adhesive resin cements.
    Aschenbrenner CM, Lang R, Handel G, Behr M.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):191-200. PubMed ID: 21327799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays.
    Hahn P, Attin T, Gröfke M, Hellwig E.
    Dent Mater; 2001 May; 17(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 11257290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Al-Saleh M, El-Mowafy O, Tam L, Fenton A.
    Oper Dent; 2010 May; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Regional bond strength to lateral walls in class I and II ceramic inlays luted with four resin cements and glass-ionomer luting agent.
    Manso AG, González-Lopez S, Bolaños-Carmona V, Maurício PJ, Félix SA, Carvalho PA.
    J Adhes Dent; 2011 Oct; 13(5):455-65. PubMed ID: 21246071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Pressable feldspathic inlays in premolars: effect of cementation strategy and mechanical cycling on the adhesive bond between dentin and restoration.
    Feitosa SA, Corazza PH, Cesar PF, Bottino MA, Valandro LF.
    J Adhes Dent; 2014 Apr; 16(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 24027771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of surface conditioning with airborne-particle abrasion on the tensile strength of polymeric CAD/CAM crowns luted with self-adhesive and conventional resin cements.
    Stawarczyk B, Basler T, Ender A, Roos M, Ozcan M, Hämmerle C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 22304743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Microleakage of porcelain veneer restorations bonded to enamel and dentin with a new self-adhesive resin-based dental cement.
    Ibarra G, Johnson GH, Geurtsen W, Vargas MA.
    Dent Mater; 2007 Feb; 23(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 16499961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of microleakage of three acid-base luting cements versus one resin-bonded cement for Class V direct composite inlays.
    Piemjai M, Miyasaka K, Iwasaki Y, Nakabayashi N.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):598-603. PubMed ID: 12488852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N, Aykent F.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Internal adaptation, marginal accuracy and microleakage of a pressable versus a machinable ceramic laminate veneers.
    Aboushelib MN, Elmahy WA, Ghazy MH.
    J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):670-7. PubMed ID: 22542500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro.
    Frankenberger R, Hehn J, Hajtó J, Krämer N, Naumann M, Koch A, Roggendorf MJ.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 22358378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Marginal adaptation of three self-adhesive resin cements vs. a well-tried adhesive luting agent.
    Behr M, Hansmann M, Rosentritt M, Handel G.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Dec; 13(4):459-64. PubMed ID: 19225814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Influence of luting agent on the microleakage of all-ceramic crowns.
    Toman M, Toksavul S, Artunç C, Türkün M, Schmage P, Nergiz I.
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Feb; 9(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 17432400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements.
    Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Schaible RB, Nikolaenko SA, Naumann M.
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 17544101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.