These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

921 related items for PubMed ID: 25270702

  • 21. A three-year clinical evaluation of two dentin bonding agents.
    Matis BA, Cochran MJ, Carlson TJ, Guba C, Eckert GJ.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Apr; 135(4):451-7. PubMed ID: 15127867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Baracco B, Perdigão J, Cabrera E, Giráldez I, Ceballos L.
    Oper Dent; 2012 Apr; 37(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 22313275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall.
    Burgess JO, Gallo JR, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ.
    Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 15301207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restorations: two-year results.
    Arhun N, Celik C, Yamanel K.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Jun; 35(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 20672723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. One-year clinical evaluation of composite restorations in posterior teeth: effect of adhesive systems.
    Sundfeld RH, Scatolin RS, Oliveira FG, Machado LS, Alexandre RS, Sundefeld ML.
    Oper Dent; 2012 Jun; 37(6):E1-8. PubMed ID: 22621163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S, Bharadwaj D, Mattar DL, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P.
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Durability of new restorative materials in Class III cavities.
    van Dijken JW.
    J Adhes Dent; 2001 Nov; 3(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 11317385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Two-centre evaluation of a resin composite/ self-etching restorative system: three-year findings.
    Wilson NH, Gordan VV, Brunton PA, Wilson MA, Crisp RJ, Mjör IA.
    J Adhes Dent; 2006 Feb; 8(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 16536345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Short- and long-term clinical evaluation of post-operative sensitivity of a new resin-based restorative material and self-etching primer.
    Gordan VV, Mjör IA.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Feb; 27(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 12413217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
    Walter R, Boushell LW, Heymann HO, Ritter AV, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD, Chung Y, Swift EJ.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014 Feb; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. One year clinical evaluation of two different types of composite resins in posterior teeth.
    Gianordoli Neto R, Santiago SL, Mendonça JS, Passos VF, Lauris JR, Navarro MF.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May 01; 9(4):26-33. PubMed ID: 18473024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Clinical evaluation of Giomer and self-etch adhesive compared with nanofilled resin composite and etch-and-rinse adhesive - Results at 8 years.
    Tian F, Mu H, Shi Y, Chen X, Zou X, Gao X, Wang X.
    Dent Mater; 2024 Jul 01; 40(7):1088-1095. PubMed ID: 38806383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
    Alves dos Santos MP, Luiz RR, Maia LC.
    J Dent; 2010 Jun 01; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Randomized clinical trial of two resin-modified glass ionomer materials: 1-year results.
    Perdigão J, Dutra-Corrêa M, Saraceni SH, Ciaramicoli MT, Kiyan VH.
    Oper Dent; 2012 Jun 01; 37(6):591-601. PubMed ID: 22770485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
    van Dijken JW, Kieri C, Carlén M.
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jul 01; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions.
    Brackett MG, Dib A, Franco G, Estrada BE, Brackett WW.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Jul 01; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20533626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
    Casagrande L, Dalpian DM, Ardenghi TM, Zanatta FB, Balbinot CE, García-Godoy F, De Araujo FB.
    Am J Dent; 2013 Dec 01; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT, Wei SH.
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct 01; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Two-year clinical evaluation of packable and nanostructured resin-based composites placed with two techniques.
    Monteiro PM, Manso MC, Gavinha S, Melo P.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Mar 01; 141(3):319-29. PubMed ID: 20194388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique.
    Baratieri LN, Ritter AV.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2001 Mar 01; 13(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 11831309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 47.