These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

174 related items for PubMed ID: 25271930

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Importance of Uranium Recovery Facility Product Characteristics for Dose Assessment and Assignment.
    Brown SH, Chambers DB.
    Health Phys; 2018 Apr; 114(4):429-435. PubMed ID: 29481534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comprehensive dose reconstruction methodology for former rocketdyne/atomics international radiation workers.
    Boice JD, Leggett RW, Ellis ED, Wallace PW, Mumma M, Cohen SS, Brill AB, Chadda B, Boecker BB, Yoder RC, Eckerman KF.
    Health Phys; 2006 May; 90(5):409-30. PubMed ID: 16607174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Assessment of uranium exposure from total activity and 234U:238U activity ratios in urine.
    Nicholas T, Bingham D.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):393-7. PubMed ID: 21036806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Determination of the solubility and size distribution of radioactive aerosols in the uranium processing plant at NRCN.
    Kravchik T, Oved S, Paztal-Levy O, Pelled O, Gonen R, German U, Tshuva A.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008 Mar; 131(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 18676447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A Bayesian analysis of uncertainties on lung doses resulting from occupational exposures to uranium.
    Puncher M, Birchall A, Bull RK.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Sep; 156(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 23528329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Collective dosimetry to distinguish occupational exposure to natural uranium from alimentary uranium background in bioassay measurements.
    Davesne E, Blanchin N, Chojnacki E, Touri L, Ruffin M, Blanchardon E, Franck D.
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2014 Nov; 90(11):1048-54. PubMed ID: 24844375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Elemental bio-imaging of thorium, uranium, and plutonium in tissues from occupationally exposed former nuclear workers.
    Hare D, Tolmachev S, James A, Bishop D, Austin C, Fryer F, Doble P.
    Anal Chem; 2010 Apr 15; 82(8):3176-82. PubMed ID: 20218581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. US Transuranium and Uranium Registries case study on accidental exposure to uranium hexafluoride.
    Avtandilashvili M, Puncher M, McComish SL, Tolmachev SY.
    J Radiol Prot; 2015 Mar 15; 35(1):129-51. PubMed ID: 25580579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Investigations on the solubility of corrosion products on depleted uranium projectiles by simulated body fluids and the consequences on dose assessment.
    Gerstmann UC, Szymczak W, Höllriegl V, Li WB, Roth P, Schramel P, Takenaka S, Oeh U.
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2008 Apr 15; 47(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 18414918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Distribution of uranium in Dounreay workers due to uptake from the environment.
    Spencer D, Bull RK, Cormack L.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007 Apr 15; 127(1-4):415-7. PubMed ID: 18263899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Further evaluations of the toxicity of irradiated advanced heavy water reactor fuels.
    Edwards GW, Priest ND.
    Health Phys; 2014 Nov 15; 107(5):417-34. PubMed ID: 25271932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Solubility characterization of airborne uranium from a uranium recycling plant.
    Metzger R, Cole L.
    Health Phys; 2004 Jul 15; 87(1):89-91. PubMed ID: 15194928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Developing in-vitro bioassay goals for plutonium and uranium for Department of Energy facilities.
    O'Connell P, Rabovsky J, Foulke J, Daniels C.
    Health Phys; 2009 Aug 15; 97(2 Suppl):S131-5. PubMed ID: 19590265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Use of group monitoring data in lung dose estimation for intakes of uranium.
    Takala JM, Kramer GH.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003 Aug 15; 105(1-4):409-12. PubMed ID: 14526998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Assessment of occupational exposure to uranium by indirect methods needs information on natural background variations.
    Muikku M, Heikkinen T, Puhakainen M, Rahola T, Salonen L.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007 Aug 15; 125(1-4):492-5. PubMed ID: 17309870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Chest wall thickness measurements and the dosimetric implications for male workers in the south Korean uranium industry.
    Kramer GH, Lee TY, Lee JI, Chang SY.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001 Aug 15; 95(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 11468802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Techniques for yellowcake dissolution studies in vitro and their use in bioassay interpretation.
    Eidson AF, Griffith WC.
    Health Phys; 1984 Jan 15; 46(1):151-63. PubMed ID: 6693235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.