These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

148 related items for PubMed ID: 25277356

  • 21. Laparoscopic anterior resection of the rectum using a triple stapled intracorporeal anastomosis in the pig.
    Fleshman JW, Brunt LM, Fry RD, Birnbaum EH, Simmang CL, Mazor A, Soper N, Freeman L, Kodner IJ.
    Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1993 Apr; 3(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 8269231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Does the third staple line of a new endostapler offer an advantage?].
    Czymek R, Keller R, Hildebrand P, Bouchard R, Bader FG, Jungbluth T, Mirow L, Roblick UJ, Bruch HP.
    Zentralbl Chir; 2009 Jun; 134(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 19536721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Initial clinical experience with a powered circular stapler for colorectal anastomosis.
    Atallah S, Kural S, Banda N, Banda A, Bawaney F, Cabral F, Neychev V, Patel C, Larach S.
    Tech Coloproctol; 2020 May; 24(5):479-486. PubMed ID: 32193667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Esophageal anastomosis following gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of hand-sewn and stapling technique.
    Takeyoshi I, Ohwada S, Ogawa T, Kawashima Y, Ohya T, Kawate S, Arai K, Nakasone Y, Morishita Y.
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2000 May; 47(34):1026-9. PubMed ID: 11020870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The effect of tissue compression on circular stapler line failure.
    Myers SR, Rothermel WS, Shaffer L.
    Surg Endosc; 2011 Sep; 25(9):3043-9. PubMed ID: 21487874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Which technique, circular stapled anastomosis or double stapling anastomosis, provides the optimal size and shape of rectal anastomotic opening?
    Sadahiro S, Kameya T, Iwase H, Ishikawa K, Suzuki T, Tokunaga N, Tajima T, Makuuchi H.
    J Surg Res; 1999 Sep; 86(1):162-6. PubMed ID: 10452884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Initial Assessment of Mucosal Capture and Leak Pressure After Gastrointestinal Stapling in a Porcine Model.
    Thompson SE, Young MT, Lewis MT, Boronyak SM, Clymer JW, Fegelman EJ, Nagle DA.
    Obes Surg; 2018 Nov; 28(11):3446-3453. PubMed ID: 29956107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. A systematic stapling defect - a potential cause of 'anastomotic' leak after restorative proctocolectomy.
    Byrne CM, Uraiqat AA, Phillips RK.
    Colorectal Dis; 2008 Mar; 10(3):286-8. PubMed ID: 17949446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The double-staple technique in colorectal anastomoses: a critical review.
    Baran JJ, Goldstein SD, Resnik AM.
    Am Surg; 1992 Apr; 58(4):270-2. PubMed ID: 1586088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Assessment of a novel stapler performance for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
    Salyer C, Spuzzillo A, Wakefield D, Gomaa D, Thompson J, Goodman M.
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):4016-4021. PubMed ID: 32749610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Can a curved stapler made for open surgery be useful in laparoscopic lower rectal resections? Technique and experience of a single centre.
    Mari FS, Gasparrini M, Nigri G, Berardi G, Laracca GG, Flora B, Pancaldi A, Brescia A.
    Surgeon; 2013 Jul; 11 Suppl 1():S23-6. PubMed ID: 23182656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Management of recurrent anastomotic stricture and iatrogenic stenosis by circular stapler.
    Rees JR, Carney L, Gill TS, Dixon AR.
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Jun; 47(6):944-7. PubMed ID: 15085438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Profiling surgical staplers: effect of staple height, buttress, and overlap on staple line failure.
    Mery CM, Shafi BM, Binyamin G, Morton JM, Gertner M.
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2008 Jun; 4(3):416-22. PubMed ID: 18226977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The circular stapling device as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage.
    Folkesson J, Nilsson J, Påhlman L, Glimelius B, Gunnarsson U.
    Colorectal Dis; 2004 Jul; 6(4):275-9. PubMed ID: 15206973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Circular stapling techniques for low anterior resection of rectal carcinoma.
    Miller K, Moritz E.
    Hepatogastroenterology; 1996 Jul; 43(10):823-31. PubMed ID: 8884297
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Safe anastomosis in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Okuda J, Tanaka K, Kondo K, Asai K, Kayano H, Yamamoto M, Tanigawa N.
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2011 May; 4(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 22776224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. A novel narrow profile articulating powered vascular stapler provides superior access and haemostasis equivalent to conventional devices†.
    Ng CS, Pickens A, Siegel JM, Clymer JW, Cummings JF.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i73-8. PubMed ID: 26464450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. A new technique for intestinal isoperistaltic anastomosis utilizing a linear stapler for enlargement after anastomosis performed with a circular stapler.
    Takeyama H, Sawai H, Sato M, Akamo Y, Yamamoto M, Funahashi H, Manabe T.
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Oct; 21(10):1891-4. PubMed ID: 17436044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Salvaging a linear staple line defect in ultra-low anterior resection.
    Tan WS, Ng KH, Eu KW.
    Tech Coloproctol; 2007 Sep; 11(3):266-7. PubMed ID: 17676263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Different characteristics of circular staplers make the difference in anastomotic tensile strength.
    Giaccaglia V, Antonelli MS, Franceschilli L, Salvi PF, Gaspari AL, Sileri P.
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jan; 53():295-300. PubMed ID: 26379251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.