These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

159 related items for PubMed ID: 25279529

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Determination of tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton ratios using Bibliocast Cécile3 digital models.
    Watanabe-Kanno GA, Abrão J, Junior HM, Sánchez-Ayala A, Lagravère MO.
    Int Orthod; 2010 Sep; 8(3):215-26. PubMed ID: 20739241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Bolton tooth size ratio and its relation with arch widths, arch length and arch perimeter: a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) study.
    Alam MK, Shahid F, Purmal K, Ahmad B, Khamis MF.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Nov; 72(8):1047-53. PubMed ID: 25220521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. A clinical photogrammetric method to measure dental arch dimensions and mesio-distal tooth size.
    Normando D, da Silva PL, Mendes ÁM.
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):721-6. PubMed ID: 21282283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models.
    Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA.
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 12828439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Mesio-distal tooth angulation in elderly with many remaining teeth observed by 3-D imaging.
    Fuma A, Motegi E, Fukagawa H, Nomura M, Kano M, Sueishi K, Okano S.
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2010 Jun; 51(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 20689235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Reliability of mixed dentition space analysis using a digital model obtained from an optical impression: a preliminary study.
    Okamoto A, Karibe H, Tanaka S, Kawakami T, Shinya A.
    BMC Res Notes; 2024 Jan 03; 17(1):12. PubMed ID: 38167562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Three-dimensional dental measurements: An alternative to plaster models.
    El-Zanaty HM, El-Beialy AR, Abou El-Ezz AM, Attia KH, El-Bialy AR, Mostafa YA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb 03; 137(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 20152684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Model analysis in "8020" achievers using three-dimensional images.
    Nomura M, Kano M, Motegi E, Fuma A, Mizuno H, Okano S, Sueishi K.
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2013 Feb 03; 54(4):223-32. PubMed ID: 24521548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis.
    Zhang F, Suh KJ, Lee KM.
    PLoS One; 2016 Feb 03; 11(6):e0157713. PubMed ID: 27304976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Which method to measure dentomaxillary discrepancy?
    Regragui S, Dakka A, Regragui F, Bouklouz A, Zaoui F.
    Int Orthod; 2010 Mar 03; 8(1):64-77. PubMed ID: 20350717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study.
    Cuperus AM, Harms MC, Rangel FA, Bronkhorst EM, Schols JG, Breuning KH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Sep 03; 142(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 22920696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.