These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

168 related items for PubMed ID: 25287618

  • 1. Modulations of eye movement patterns by spatial filtering during the learning and testing phases of an old/new face recognition task.
    Lemieux CL, Collin CA, Nelson EA.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):536-50. PubMed ID: 25287618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Does face inversion qualitatively change face processing: an eye movement study using a face change detection task.
    Xu B, Tanaka JW.
    J Vis; 2013 Feb 18; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 23420421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Faces elicit different scanning patterns depending on task demands.
    Boutet I, Lemieux CL, Goulet MA, Collin CA.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May 18; 79(4):1050-1063. PubMed ID: 28185225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Is having similar eye movement patterns during face learning and recognition beneficial for recognition performance? Evidence from hidden Markov modeling.
    Chuk T, Chan AB, Hsiao JH.
    Vision Res; 2017 Dec 18; 141():204-216. PubMed ID: 28435123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.
    Tanaka JW, Kaiser MD, Hagen S, Pierce LJ.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May 18; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Filtered beauty in Oslo and Tokyo: A spatial frequency analysis of facial attractiveness.
    Øvervoll M, Schettino I, Suzuki H, Okubo M, Laeng B.
    PLoS One; 2020 May 18; 15(1):e0227513. PubMed ID: 31935264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia.
    Kimchi R, Behrmann M, Avidan G, Amishav R.
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2012 May 18; 29(5-6):447-63. PubMed ID: 23428081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Spatial frequency thresholds for face recognition when comparison faces are filtered and unfiltered.
    Collin CA, Therrien M, Martin C, Rainville S.
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Aug 18; 68(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17153184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Aberrant first fixations when looking at inverted faces in various poses: the result of the centre-of-gravity effect?
    Hills PJ, Sullivan AJ, Pake JM.
    Br J Psychol; 2012 Nov 18; 103(4):520-38. PubMed ID: 23034110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Training of familiar face recognition and visual scan paths for faces in a child with congenital prosopagnosia.
    Schmalzl L, Palermo R, Green M, Brunsdon R, Coltheart M.
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008 Jul 18; 25(5):704-29. PubMed ID: 18720102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.