These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

900 related items for PubMed ID: 25296729

  • 1. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Burhan AS, Nawaya FR.
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Jamilian A, Showkatbakhsh R, Amiri SS.
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 20956385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK, Sachdev V, Singla A, Kirtaniya BC.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012 Aug; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Mechanisms of Class II correction induced by the crown Herbst appliance as a single-phase Class II therapy: 1 year follow-up.
    Jakobsone G, Latkauskiene D, McNamara JA.
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep 11; 14():27. PubMed ID: 24326090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Dental and skeletal components of Class II open bite treatment with a modified Thurow appliance.
    Jacob HB, dos Santos-Pinto A, Buschang PH.
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014 Sep 11; 19(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 24713556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparative Evaluation of Twin Block Appliance and Fixed Orthodontic Appliance in Early Class II Malocclusion Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Radwan ES, Maher A, Montasser MA.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Nov 01; 23(11):1111-1121. PubMed ID: 37073934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. An assessment of late fixed functional treatment and the stability of Forsus appliance effects.
    Gao W, Li X, Bai Y.
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May 01; 30(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 24968640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
    Baysal A, Uysal T.
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr 01; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P, Baccetti T, Mucedero M, Pavoni C, Franchi L.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep 01; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS, Kiliaridis S.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May 01; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Differential skeletal and dental effects after orthodontic treatment with bite jumping appliance or activator: a retrospective cephalometric study.
    Hourfar J, Kinzinger GSM, Euchner L, Lisson JA.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Jul 01; 24(7):2513-2521. PubMed ID: 31705310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Treatment effects of R-appliance and Fränkel-2 in Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Showkatbakhsh R, Castaldo MI, Jamilian A, Padricelli G, Fahimi Hanzayi M, Cappabianca S, Perillo L.
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Mar 01; 14(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 23597214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions.
    Hanandeh BA, El-Bialy AA.
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010 Mar 01; 21(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 21314084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Long-term dentoskeletal changes with the Bionator, Herbst, Twin Block, and MARA functional appliances.
    Siara-Olds NJ, Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger J, Bayirli B.
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan 01; 80(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 19852635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
    Fontana M, Cozzani M, Caprioglio A.
    Prog Orthod; 2012 May 01; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 45.