These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
556 related items for PubMed ID: 25315304
21. Computer planning and intraoperative navigation in orthognathic surgery. Bell RB. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 69(3):592-605. PubMed ID: 21353924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Reconstruction of complex mandibular defect with computer-aided navigation and orthognathic surgery. Zhang W, Li B, Gui H, Zhang L, Wang X, Shen G. J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):e229-33. PubMed ID: 23714972 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion with clockwise rotation of the maxillomandibular complex. Tsai IM, Lin CH, Wang YC. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 22284290 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A novel method of computer aided orthognathic surgery using individual CAD/CAM templates: a combination of osteotomy and repositioning guides. Li B, Zhang L, Sun H, Yuan J, Shen SG, Wang X. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):e239-44. PubMed ID: 23566536 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Does two-dimensional vs. three-dimensional surgical simulation produce better surgical outcomes among patients with class III facial asymmetry? Udomlarptham N, Lin CH, Wang YC, Ko EW. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 47(8):1022-1031. PubMed ID: 29606563 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Orthognathic surgical planning on three-dimensional stereolithographic biomodel. Erkan M, Ulkur E, Karagoz H, Karacay S, Basaran G, Sonmez G. J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 22(4):1336-41. PubMed ID: 21772191 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery? Kim YJ, Oh KM, Hong JS, Lee JH, Kim HM, Reyes M, Cevidanes LH, Park YH. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Severe facial asymmetry and unilateral lingual crossbite treated with orthodontics and 2-jaw surgery: 5-year follow-up. Tai K, Park JH, Ikeda K, Nishiyama A, Sato Y. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Oct; 142(4):509-23. PubMed ID: 22999675 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Orthognathic treatment with autotransplantation of a third molar. Choi SH, Hwang CJ. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):737-47. PubMed ID: 24182590 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Validation of new soft tissue software in orthognathic surgery planning. Marchetti C, Bianchi A, Muyldermans L, Di Martino M, Lancellotti L, Sarti A. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 40(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 21030211 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Mandibular distraction combined with orthognathic techniques for the correction of severe adult mandibular hypoplasia. Yin L, Tang X, Shi L, Yin H, Zhang Z. J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):1947-52. PubMed ID: 25377953 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Frontal soft tissue analysis using a 3 dimensional camera following two-jaw rotational orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients. Choi JW, Lee JY, Oh TS, Kwon SM, Yang SJ, Koh KS. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23870714 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Digital model planning and computerized fabrication of orthognathic surgery wafers. Cousley RR, Turner MJ. J Orthod; 2014 Mar; 41(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 24235100 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The Drilling Guiding Templates and Pre-Bent Titanium Plates Improves the Operation Accuracy of Orthognathic Surgery With Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacturing Occlusal Splints for Patients With Facial Asymmetry. Hu P, Li J, Du W, Ji H, Xu C, Luo E. J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 30(7):2144-2148. PubMed ID: 31232991 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Development of a simulation system in mandibular orthognathic surgery based on integrated three-dimensional data. Mori Y, Shimizu H, Minami K, Kwon TG, Mano T. Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 15(3):131-8. PubMed ID: 20981462 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Postoperative stability for surgery-first approach using intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: 12 month follow-up. Kim JY, Jung HD, Kim SY, Park HS, Jung YS. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 52(6):539-44. PubMed ID: 24746355 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Corticotomy-assisted decompensation for augmentation of the mandibular anterior ridge. Kim SH, Kim I, Jeong DM, Chung KR, Zadeh H. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):720-31. PubMed ID: 22051493 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The relationship between the changes in three-dimensional facial morphology and mandibular movement after orthognathic surgery. Kim DS, Huh KH, Lee SS, Heo MS, Choi SC, Hwang SJ, Yi WJ. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):686-93. PubMed ID: 23465640 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Virtual model surgery and wafer fabrication for orthognathic surgery. Choi JY, Song KG, Baek SH. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Dec; 38(12):1306-10. PubMed ID: 19596555 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]