These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


109 related items for PubMed ID: 2532003

  • 1. Synthetic two-formant vowel perception by some of the better cochlear-implant patients.
    Tyler RS, Tye-Murray N, Moore BC, McCabe BF.
    Audiology; 1989; 28(6):301-15. PubMed ID: 2532003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The recognition of vowels differing by a single formant by cochlear-implant subjects.
    Tyler RS, Tye-Murray N, Otto SR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Dec; 86(6):2107-12. PubMed ID: 2532227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Vowel perception strategies of normal-hearing subjects and patients using Nucleus multichannel and 3M/House cochlear implants.
    Tartter VC, Hellman SA, Chute PM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1269-83. PubMed ID: 1401515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The use of static and dynamic vowel cues by multichannel cochlear implant users.
    Kirk KI, Tye-Murray N, Hurtig RR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3487-98. PubMed ID: 1619125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems: perception of formant targets, formant movement, and duration.
    Iverson P, Evans BG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2842-54. PubMed ID: 18189574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS, Kreft HA.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of speaking rate on the perception of vowels.
    Gottfried TL, Miller JL, Payton PE.
    Phonetica; 1990 Dec; 47(3-4):155-72. PubMed ID: 2151828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Loizou PC, Poroy O.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Place coding of vowel formants for cochlear implant patients.
    Blamey PJ, Clark GM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):667-73. PubMed ID: 2212290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.