These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

123 related items for PubMed ID: 2532227

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Synthetic two-formant vowel perception by some of the better cochlear-implant patients.
    Tyler RS, Tye-Murray N, Moore BC, McCabe BF.
    Audiology; 1989; 28(6):301-15. PubMed ID: 2532003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Identification of synthetic vowels by patients using the Symbion multichannel cochlear implant.
    Dorman MF, Dankowski K, McCandless G, Smith L.
    Ear Hear; 1989 Feb; 10(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 2721827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Vowel perception: experiments with a single-electrode cochlear implant.
    Doyle KJ, Danhauer JL, Edgerton BJ.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):179-92. PubMed ID: 3755193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Place coding of vowel formants for cochlear implant patients.
    Blamey PJ, Clark GM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):667-73. PubMed ID: 2212290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Perceptual "vowel spaces" of cochlear implant users: implications for the study of auditory adaptation to spectral shift.
    Harnsberger JD, Svirsky MA, Kaiser AR, Pisoni DB, Wright R, Meyer TA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2135-45. PubMed ID: 11386565
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Vowel recognition via cochlear implants and noise vocoders: effects of formant movement and duration.
    Iverson P, Smith CA, Evans BG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Dec; 120(6):3998-4006. PubMed ID: 17225426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Identification of speech by cochlear implant recipients with the Multipeak (MPEAK) and Spectral Peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies. I. Vowels.
    Skinner MW, Fourakis MS, Holden TA, Holden LK, Demorest ME.
    Ear Hear; 1996 Jun; 17(3):182-97. PubMed ID: 8807261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M, Hanekom JJ.
    J Commun Disord; 2013 Jun; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Vowel and consonant recognition with the aid of a multichannel cochlear implant.
    Dorman MF, Dankowski K, McCandless G, Parkin JL, Smith L.
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):585-601. PubMed ID: 1775658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Linear phoneme boundaries for German synthetic two-formant vowels.
    Hose B, Langner G, Scheich H.
    Hear Res; 1983 Jan; 9(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 6219082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users.
    Prévost F, Lehmann A.
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Acoustic Analysis of Persian Vowels in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison With Hearing-impaired Children Using Hearing Aid and Normal-hearing Children.
    Jafari N, Yadegari F, Jalaie S.
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e1-763.e7. PubMed ID: 26725549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.