These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

233 related items for PubMed ID: 25367766

  • 1. Recurrence quantification analysis of electroencephalograph signals during standard tasks of Waterloo-Stanford group scale of hypnotic susceptibility.
    Yargholi E, Nasrabadi AM.
    J Med Eng Technol; 2015 Jan; 39(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 25367766
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Chaos-chaos transition of left hemisphere EEGs during standard tasks of Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of hypnotic susceptibility.
    Yargholi E, Nasrabadi AM.
    J Med Eng Technol; 2015 Jan; 39(5):281-5. PubMed ID: 26000729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The impacts of hypnotic susceptibility on chaotic dynamics of EEG signals during standard tasks of Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale.
    Yargholi E, Nasrabadi AM.
    J Med Eng Technol; 2013 May; 37(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 23705995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form C: manual and response booklet.
    Bowers KS.
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1998 Jul; 46(3):250-68. PubMed ID: 9650438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) scale of hypnotic susceptibility: normative and comparative data.
    Bowers KS.
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Jan; 41(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 8425774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The relation of self-reports of hypnotic depth in self-hypnosis to hypnotizability and imagery production.
    Kahn SP, Fromm E, Lombard LS, Sossi M.
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1989 Oct; 37(4):290-304. PubMed ID: 2793270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The phenomenology of the experiences and the depth of hypnosis: comparison of direct and indirect induction techniques.
    Szabó C.
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Jul; 41(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 8335421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A note of caution on the Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of hypnotic susceptibility: a brief communication.
    Cardeña E, Terhune DB.
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2009 Apr; 57(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 19234968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Experiential scoring for the Waterloo-Stanford Group C scale.
    Kirsch I, Milling LS, Burgess C.
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1998 Jul; 46(3):269-79. PubMed ID: 9650439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The efficacy of the Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of hypnotic susceptibility: form C.
    Moran TE, Kurtz RM, Strube MJ.
    Am J Clin Hypn; 2002 Jul; 44(3-4):221-30. PubMed ID: 11799536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. 40-Hz EEG asymmetry during recall of emotional events in waking and hypnosis: differences between low and high hypnotizables.
    De Pascalis V, Marucci FS, Penna PM.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1989 Mar; 7(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 2925468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Imagery and hypnotizability revisited.
    Kogon MM, Jasiukaitis P, Berardi A, Gupta M, Kosslyn SM, Spiegel D.
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1998 Oct; 46(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 9780527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. 40-Hz EEG activity during hypnotic induction and hypnotic testing.
    DePascalis V, Penna PM.
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Apr; 38(2):125-38. PubMed ID: 2347669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. EEG phase synchronization during hypnosis induction.
    Baghdadi G, Nasrabadi AM.
    J Med Eng Technol; 2012 May; 36(4):222-9. PubMed ID: 22439789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Is Hypnotic Induction Necessary to Experience Hypnosis and Responsible for Changes in Brain Activity?
    Callara AL, Zelič Ž, Fontanelli L, Greco A, Santarcangelo EL, Sebastiani L.
    Brain Sci; 2023 May 29; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 37371355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. EEG spectral analysis during hypnotic induction, hypnotic dream and age regression.
    De Pascalis V.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1993 Sep 29; 15(2):153-66. PubMed ID: 8244843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Lack of correlation between hypnotic susceptibility and various components of attention.
    Varga K, Németh Z, Szekely A.
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec 29; 20(4):1872-81. PubMed ID: 21963402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The neurophenomenology of neutral hypnosis.
    Cardeña E, Jönsson P, Terhune DB, Marcusson-Clavertz D.
    Cortex; 2013 Feb 29; 49(2):375-85. PubMed ID: 22579225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cross-evidence for hypnotic susceptibility through nonlinear measures on EEGs of non-hypnotized subjects.
    Chiarucci R, Madeo D, Loffredo MI, Castellani E, Santarcangelo EL, Mocenni C.
    Sci Rep; 2014 Jul 08; 4():5610. PubMed ID: 25002038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Portuguese norms for the Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) scale of hypnotic susceptibility.
    Carvalho C, Kirsch I, Mazzoni G, Leal I.
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2008 Jul 08; 56(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 18569140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.