These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

268 related items for PubMed ID: 25389669

  • 1. Comparison of methods for acceptance and constancy testing in dental cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C, Kolditz D, Kalender W.
    Rofo; 2015 Apr; 187(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 25389669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C, Kolditz D, Kalender WA.
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031901. PubMed ID: 24593719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Image quality assessment of three cone beam CT machines using the SEDENTEXCT CT phantom.
    Bamba J, Araki K, Endo A, Okano T.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013 Mar; 42(8):20120445. PubMed ID: 23956235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Objective image quality assurance in cone-beam CT: Test methods, analysis, and workflow in longitudinal studies.
    Johnston A, Mahesh M, Uneri A, Rypinski TA, Boone JM, Siewerdsen JH.
    Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):2424-2443. PubMed ID: 38354310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners.
    Suomalainen A, Kiljunen T, Käser Y, Peltola J, Kortesniemi M.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):367-78. PubMed ID: 19700530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Technical Note: Assessing the performance of monthly CBCT image quality QA.
    Manger RP, Pawlicki T, Hoisak J, Kim GY.
    Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 46(6):2575-2579. PubMed ID: 30972767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A multipurpose quality assurance phantom for the small animal radiation research platform (SARRP).
    Ngwa W, Tsiamas P, Zygmanski P, Makrigiorgos GM, Berbeco RI.
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 May 07; 57(9):2575-86. PubMed ID: 22491061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A framework for automated and streamlined kV cone beam computed tomography image quality assurance: a multi-institutional study.
    Ayan AS, Kim G, Whitaker M, Al-Hallaq H, Hsu SH, Woollard J, Roberts DA, Shtraus N, Gao S, Gupta N, Moran JM.
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Oct 05; 7(6):. PubMed ID: 34544065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Development and validation of two phantoms for quality control in cone-beam CT.
    Gomes Batista WO.
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2018 Aug 05; 138():29-34. PubMed ID: 28764971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Dose and image quality evaluation of a dedicated cone-beam CT system for high-contrast neurologic applications.
    Yu L, Vrieze TJ, Bruesewitz MR, Kofler JM, DeLone DR, Pallanch JF, Lindell EP, McCollough CH.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb 05; 194(2):W193-201. PubMed ID: 20093573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Development of clinically relevant QA procedures for the BrainLab ExacTrac imaging system.
    Iftimia I, Halvorsen PH.
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May 05; 19(3):108-113. PubMed ID: 29524294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.