These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

687 related items for PubMed ID: 25406652

  • 21. Anatomical characteristics and dimensions of edentulous sites in the posterior maxillae of patients referred for implant therapy.
    Nunes LS, Bornstein MM, Sendi P, Buser D.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 23593627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Bone density at interradicular sites: implications for orthodontic mini-implant placement.
    Chun YS, Lim WH.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Feb; 12(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 19154272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M, Yoshida T, Ono A, Shimizu N.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Feb; 22(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 17974113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Why are mini-implants lost: the value of the implantation technique!
    Romano FL, Consolaro A.
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 20(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 25741821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Assessment of safe zone in maxillary molar region for miniscrew placement in the mixed dentition period--a digital volumetric tomographic (DVT) study.
    Hotwani K, Baliga S, Thosar N, Sharma K.
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014 Feb; 25(3):39-42. PubMed ID: 25745723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
    Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, Willems G.
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Cortical bone thickness in the buccal posterior region for orthodontic mini-implants.
    Ono A, Motoyoshi M, Shimizu N.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Apr; 37(4):334-40. PubMed ID: 18295454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Computed tomographic characterization of mini-implant placement pattern and maximum anchorage force in human cadavers.
    Lemieux G, Hart A, Cheretakis C, Goodmurphy C, Trexler S, McGary C, Retrouvey JM.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):356-65. PubMed ID: 21889080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Three-dimensional tomographic mapping related to primary stability and structural miniscrew characteristics.
    Silvestrini Biavati A, Tecco S, Migliorati M, Festa F, Panza G, Marzo G, Gherlone E, Tetè S.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 May; 14(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 21457458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance.
    Tai K, Hotokezaka H, Park JH, Tai H, Miyajima K, Choi M, Kai LM, Mishima K.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):262.e1-262.e11; discussion 262-3. PubMed ID: 20816294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Is there an ideal insertion angle and position for orthodontic mini-implants in the anterior palate? A CBCT study in humans.
    Becker K, Unland J, Wilmes B, Tarraf NE, Drescher D.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Sep; 156(3):345-354. PubMed ID: 31474264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Evaluation of mini-implant sites in the posterior maxilla using traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Abbassy MA, Sabban HM, Hassan AH, Zawawi KH.
    Saudi Med J; 2015 Nov; 36(11):1336-41. PubMed ID: 26593168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Comparison of transverse analysis between posteroanterior cephalogram and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Lee KM, Hwang HS, Cho JH.
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):715-9. PubMed ID: 24325622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Tooth-borne vs bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders in late adolescence.
    Lin L, Ahn HW, Kim SJ, Moon SC, Kim SH, Nelson G.
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 25490552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary interradicular sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement.
    Lim JE, Lim WH, Chun YS.
    Clin Anat; 2008 Sep; 21(6):486-91. PubMed ID: 18698651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The detection of periapical pathosis using digital periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography - part 2: a 1-year post-treatment follow-up.
    Patel S, Wilson R, Dawood A, Foschi F, Mannocci F.
    Int Endod J; 2012 Aug; 45(8):711-23. PubMed ID: 22775142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Co-axial computed tomography for optimizing orthodontic miniscrew implant size and site of placement.
    Bhalla K, Kalha AS.
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2013 Aug; 24(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 23729136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography for assessment of the periapical bone defect 1 week and 12 months after root-end resection.
    Christiansen R, Kirkevang LL, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Dec; 38(8):531-6. PubMed ID: 20026710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Topographic analysis of maxillary premolars and molars and maxillary sinus using cone beam computed tomography.
    Yoshimine S, Nishihara K, Nozoe E, Yoshimine M, Nakamura N.
    Implant Dent; 2012 Dec; 21(6):528-35. PubMed ID: 23114831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of different surgical techniques and their effects on the maxillary dentoskeletal complex.
    Sygouros A, Motro M, Ugurlu F, Acar A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 25432256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 35.