These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


877 related items for PubMed ID: 25413154

  • 1. PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews.
    Methley AM, Campbell S, Chew-Graham C, McNally R, Cheraghi-Sohi S.
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2014 Nov 21; 14():579. PubMed ID: 25413154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis.
    Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A.
    Qual Health Res; 2012 Oct 21; 22(10):1435-43. PubMed ID: 22829486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Using the full PICO model as a search tool for systematic reviews resulted in lower recall for some PICO elements.
    Frandsen TF, Bruun Nielsen MF, Lindhardt CL, Eriksen MB.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Nov 21; 127():69-75. PubMed ID: 32679315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Expediting citation screening using PICo-based title-only screening for identifying studies in scoping searches and rapid reviews.
    Rathbone J, Albarqouni L, Bakhit M, Beller E, Byambasuren O, Hoffmann T, Scott AM, Glasziou P.
    Syst Rev; 2017 Nov 25; 6(1):233. PubMed ID: 29178925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Assessing the performance of methodological search filters to improve the efficiency of evidence information retrieval: five literature reviews and a qualitative study.
    Lefebvre C, Glanville J, Beale S, Boachie C, Duffy S, Fraser C, Harbour J, McCool R, Smith L.
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Nov 25; 21(69):1-148. PubMed ID: 29188764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. "Brimful of STARLITE": toward standards for reporting literature searches.
    Booth A.
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2006 Oct 25; 94(4):421-9, e205. PubMed ID: 17082834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Searching for evidence or approval? A commentary on database search in systematic reviews and alternative information retrieval methodologies.
    Delaney A, Tamás PA.
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar 25; 9(1):124-131. PubMed ID: 29106042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Supplementary strategies identified additional eligible studies in qualitative systematic reviews.
    Frandsen TF, Eriksen MB.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jul 25; 159():85-91. PubMed ID: 37201687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A comparison of metrics and performance characteristics of different search strategies for article retrieval for a systematic review of the global epidemiology of kidney and urinary diseases.
    Bikbov B, Perico N, Remuzzi G, GBD Genitourinary Diseases Expert Group.
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct 19; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30340535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Performance of a mixed filter to identify relevant studies for mixed studies reviews.
    El Sherif R, Pluye P, Gore G, Granikov V, Hong QN.
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2016 Jan 19; 104(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 26807052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough.
    Boeker M, Vach W, Motschall E.
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Oct 26; 13():131. PubMed ID: 24160679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 44.