These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v. Lim K, Kwon H, Cho J, Oh J, Yoon S, Kang M, Ha D, Lee J, Kang E. J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015 Dec; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. 256-MDCT for evaluation of urolithiasis: iterative reconstruction allows for a significant reduction of the applied radiation dose while maintaining high subjective and objective image quality. Veldhoen S, Laqmani A, Derlin T, Karul M, Hammerle D, Buhk JH, Sehner S, Nagel HD, Chun F, Adam G, Regier M. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2014 Dec; 58(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 24581030 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiation dose reduction with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) technique for chest CT in children: an intra-individual comparison. Lee SH, Kim MJ, Yoon CS, Lee MJ. Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):e938-43. PubMed ID: 22795526 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Image quality of CT angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction in young children with congenital heart disease: comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Son SS, Choo KS, Jeon UB, Jeon GR, Nam KJ, Kim TU, Yeom JA, Hwang JY, Jeong DW, Lim SJ. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():31-8. PubMed ID: 25414055 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. CT of the pancreas: comparison of image quality and pancreatic duct depiction among model-based iterative, adaptive statistical iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Lin XZ, Machida H, Tanaka I, Fukui R, Ueno E, Chen KM, Yan FH. Abdom Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 24496703 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh J, Licato PE, Do S, Pien HH, Blake MA. Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 20829535 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Kwon H, Cho J, Oh J, Kim D, Cho J, Kim S, Lee S, Lee J. Br J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 88(1054):20150463. PubMed ID: 26234823 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, Silva AC, Paden RG, Wu Q. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for pulmonary CT: image quality of the cadaveric lung on standard- and reduced-dose CT. Yanagawa M, Honda O, Yoshida S, Kikuyama A, Inoue A, Sumikawa H, Koyama M, Tomiyama N. Acad Radiol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1259-66. PubMed ID: 20634106 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]