These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

249 related items for PubMed ID: 25421087

  • 1. Investigating interaural frequency-place mismatches via bimodal vowel integration.
    Guérit F, Santurette S, Chalupper J, Dau T.
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov 23; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Acoustic Analysis of Persian Vowels in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison With Hearing-impaired Children Using Hearing Aid and Normal-hearing Children.
    Jafari N, Yadegari F, Jalaie S.
    J Voice; 2016 Nov 23; 30(6):763.e1-763.e7. PubMed ID: 26725549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
    Schatzer R, Vermeire K, Visser D, Krenmayr A, Kals M, Voormolen M, Van de Heyning P, Zierhofer C.
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar 23; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: contributions of static and dynamic spectral cues.
    Donaldson GS, Rogers CL, Cardenas ES, Russell BA, Hanna NH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct 23; 134(4):3021-8. PubMed ID: 24116437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of envelope bandwidth on importance functions for cochlear implant simulations.
    Whitmal NA, DeMaio D, Lin R.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb 23; 137(2):733-44. PubMed ID: 25698008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Simulating the effect of interaural mismatch in the insertion depth of bilateral cochlear implants on speech perception.
    van Besouw RM, Forrester L, Crowe ND, Rowan D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug 23; 134(2):1348-57. PubMed ID: 23927131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.
    Goldsworthy RL, Delhorne LA, Braida LD, Reed CM.
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar 23; 17(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 23429419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparing sound localization deficits in bilateral cochlear-implant users and vocoder simulations with normal-hearing listeners.
    Jones H, Kan A, Litovsky RY.
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov 10; 18():. PubMed ID: 25385244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A Comparison of Persian Vowel Production in Hearing-Impaired Children Using a Cochlear Implant and Normal-Hearing Children.
    Jafari N, Drinnan M, Mohamadi R, Yadegari F, Nourbakhsh M, Torabinezhad F.
    J Voice; 2016 May 10; 30(3):340-4. PubMed ID: 25990321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users.
    Kan A, Stoelb C, Litovsky RY, Goupell MJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct 10; 134(4):2923-36. PubMed ID: 24116428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Two Ears Are Not Always Better than One: Mandatory Vowel Fusion Across Spectrally Mismatched Ears in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Reiss LA, Eggleston JL, Walker EP, Oh Y.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Aug 10; 17(4):341-56. PubMed ID: 27220769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Head shadow enhancement with low-frequency beamforming improves sound localization and speech perception for simulated bimodal listeners.
    Dieudonné B, Francart T.
    Hear Res; 2018 Jun 10; 363():78-84. PubMed ID: 29555110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Interaural envelope correlation change discrimination in bilateral cochlear implantees: effects of mismatch, centering, and onset of deafness.
    Goupell MJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar 10; 137(3):1282-97. PubMed ID: 25786942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Contribution of formant frequency information to vowel perception in steady-state noise by cochlear implant users.
    Sagi E, Svirsky MA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb 10; 141(2):1027. PubMed ID: 28253672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Bimodal benefits in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing.
    Yang HI, Zeng FG.
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Feb 10; 56(sup2):S17-S22. PubMed ID: 28485635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Effect of Interaural Mismatches on Contralateral Unmasking With Single-Sided Vocoders.
    Wess JM, Brungart DS, Bernstein JGW.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Feb 10; 38(3):374-386. PubMed ID: 28002083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Voice gender discrimination provides a measure of more than pitch-related perception in cochlear implant users.
    Li T, Fu QJ.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug 10; 50(8):498-502. PubMed ID: 21696330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Spatial tuning curves from apical, middle, and basal electrodes in cochlear implant users.
    Nelson DA, Kreft HA, Anderson ES, Donaldson GS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun 10; 129(6):3916-33. PubMed ID: 21682414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The temporal mismatch across listening sides affects cortical auditory evoked responses in normal hearing listeners and cochlear implant users with contralateral acoustic hearing.
    Dolhopiatenko H, Segovia-Martinez M, Nogueira W.
    Hear Res; 2024 Sep 15; 451():109088. PubMed ID: 39032483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Speech perception of sine-wave signals by children with cochlear implants.
    Nittrouer S, Kuess J, Lowenstein JH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May 15; 137(5):2811-22. PubMed ID: 25994709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.