These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1088 related items for PubMed ID: 25421088

  • 1. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
    Ng EH, Classon E, Larsby B, Arlinger S, Lunner T, Rudner M, Rönnberg J.
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov 23; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.
    Rählmann S, Meis M, Schulte M, Kießling J, Walger M, Meister H.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun 23; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.
    Ng EH, Rudner M, Lunner T, Pedersen MS, Rönnberg J.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul 23; 52(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 23550584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Auditory acclimatization and hearing aids: late auditory evoked potentials and speech recognition following unilateral and bilateral amplification.
    Dawes P, Munro KJ, Kalluri S, Edwards B.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun 23; 135(6):3560-9. PubMed ID: 24907819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M, Foo C, Rönnberg J, Lunner T.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec 23; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
    Searchfield GD, Linford T, Kobayashi K, Crowhen D, Latzel M.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar 23; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability.
    Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD, Perez ZD, D'Aquila LA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun 23; 141(6):4452. PubMed ID: 28679277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cognitive abilities relate to self-reported hearing disability.
    Zekveld AA, George EL, Houtgast T, Kramer SE.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct 23; 56(5):1364-72. PubMed ID: 23838985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Gated auditory speech perception in elderly hearing aid users and elderly normal-hearing individuals: effects of hearing impairment and cognitive capacity.
    Moradi S, Lidestam B, Hällgren M, Rönnberg J.
    Trends Hear; 2014 Jul 31; 18():. PubMed ID: 25085610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
    Dawes P, Munro KJ, Kalluri S, Edwards B.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Jul 31; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids.
    Rudner M, Foo C, Rönnberg J, Lunner T.
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct 31; 50(5):405-18. PubMed ID: 19778388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Danish reading span data from 283 hearing-aid users, including a sub-group analysis of their relationship to speech-in-noise performance.
    Borch Petersen E, Lunner T, Vestergaard MD, Sundewall Thorén E.
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Oct 31; 55(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 26836955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Benefit from non-linear frequency compression hearing aids in a clinical setting: the effects of duration of experience and severity of high-frequency hearing loss.
    Hopkins K, Khanom M, Dickinson AM, Munro KJ.
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Apr 31; 53(4):219-28. PubMed ID: 24617592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
    Picou EM, Ricketts TA.
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec 31; 56(12):909-918. PubMed ID: 28738747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant.
    Lenarz T, James C, Cuda D, Fitzgerald O'Connor A, Frachet B, Frijns JH, Klenzner T, Laszig R, Manrique M, Marx M, Merkus P, Mylanus EA, Offeciers E, Pesch J, Ramos-Macias A, Robier A, Sterkers O, Uziel A.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec 31; 52(12):838-48. PubMed ID: 23992489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Hearing impairment, cognition and speech understanding: exploratory factor analyses of a comprehensive test battery for a group of hearing aid users, the n200 study.
    Rönnberg J, Lunner T, Ng EH, Lidestam B, Zekveld AA, Sörqvist P, Lyxell B, Träff U, Yumba W, Classon E, Hällgren M, Larsby B, Signoret C, Pichora-Fuller MK, Rudner M, Danielsson H, Stenfelt S.
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov 31; 55(11):623-42. PubMed ID: 27589015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Placebo effects in hearing-aid trials are reliable.
    Dawes P, Hopkins R, Munro KJ.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul 31; 52(7):472-7. PubMed ID: 23594421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Auditory training of speech recognition with interrupted and continuous noise maskers by children with hearing impairment.
    Sullivan JR, Thibodeau LM, Assmann PF.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan 31; 133(1):495-501. PubMed ID: 23297921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Syllable-constituent perception by hearing-aid users: Common factors in quiet and noise.
    Miller JD, Watson CS, Leek MR, Dubno JR, Wark DJ, Souza PE, Gordon-Salant S, Ahlstrom JB.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr 31; 141(4):2933. PubMed ID: 28464618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 55.