These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


138 related items for PubMed ID: 25437132

  • 1. Too close for comfort: Stimulus valence moderates the influence of motivational orientation on distance perception.
    Krpan D, Schnall S.
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2014 Dec; 107(6):978-93. PubMed ID: 25437132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Close or far? Affect explains conflicting findings on motivated distance perception to rewards.
    Krpan D, Schnall S.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():188-198. PubMed ID: 30125882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Being moved: valence activates approach-avoidance behavior independently of evaluation and approach-avoidance intentions.
    Krieglmeyer R, Deutsch R, De Houwer J, De Raedt R.
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Apr; 21(4):607-13. PubMed ID: 20424109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Visual perception and regulatory conflict: motivation and physiology influence distance perception.
    Cole S, Balcetis E, Zhang S.
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Feb; 142(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 22449101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Anger perceptually and conceptually narrows cognitive scope.
    Gable PA, Poole BD, Harmon-Jones E.
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2015 Jul; 109(1):163-74. PubMed ID: 26011662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The impact of changes in spatial distance on emotional responses.
    Mühlberger A, Neumann R, Wieser MJ, Pauli P.
    Emotion; 2008 Apr; 8(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 18410193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Time flies when you're having approach-motivated fun: effects of motivational intensity on time perception.
    Gable PA, Poole BD.
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Aug 01; 23(8):879-86. PubMed ID: 22760888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cognitive consequences of motivational orientation: perceived similarity between objects.
    Nussinson R, Seibt B, Häfner M, Strack F.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep 01; 138(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 21636065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A common-coding account of the bidirectional evaluation-behavior link.
    Eder AB, Klauer KC.
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May 01; 138(2):218-35. PubMed ID: 19397381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The Blur of Pleasure: Appetitively Appealing Stimuli Decrease Subjective Temporal Perceptual Acuity.
    Roberts KH, Truong G, Kingstone A, Todd RM.
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov 01; 28(11):1563-1582. PubMed ID: 28930644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Seeing direct and averted gaze activates the approach-avoidance motivational brain systems.
    Hietanen JK, Leppänen JM, Peltola MJ, Linna-Aho K, Ruuhiala HJ.
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Nov 01; 46(9):2423-30. PubMed ID: 18402988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Aspects of neuroticism and the amygdala: chronic tuning from motivational styles.
    Cunningham WA, Arbuckle NL, Jahn A, Mowrer SM, Abduljalil AM.
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Oct 01; 48(12):3399-404. PubMed ID: 20600183
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Contrasting motivational orientation and evaluative coding accounts: on the need to differentiate the effectors of approach/avoidance responses.
    Kozlik J, Neumann R, Lozo L.
    Front Psychol; 2015 Oct 01; 6():563. PubMed ID: 25983718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Implicit motivational value and salience are processed in distinct areas of orbitofrontal cortex.
    Rothkirch M, Schmack K, Schlagenhauf F, Sterzer P.
    Neuroimage; 2012 Sep 01; 62(3):1717-25. PubMed ID: 22728149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Are blood-injection-injury stimuli different from other negative categories? An ERP study.
    Schäfer A, Scharmüller W, Leutgeb V, Köchel A, Schienle A.
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul 12; 478(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 20470862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cognitive dissonance and the perception of natural environments.
    Balcetis E, Dunning D.
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Oct 12; 18(10):917-21. PubMed ID: 17894610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Individual differences in approach and avoidance movements: how the avoidance motive influences response force.
    Puca RM, Rinkenauer G, Breidenstein C.
    J Pers; 2006 Aug 12; 74(4):979-1014. PubMed ID: 16787426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Affective picture modulation: valence, arousal, attention allocation and motivational significance.
    Leite J, Carvalho S, Galdo-Alvarez S, Alves J, Sampaio A, Gonçalves OF.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Mar 12; 83(3):375-81. PubMed ID: 22226675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Perceptual grouping and distance estimates in typical and atypical development: comparing performance across perception, drawing and construction tasks.
    Farran EK, Cole VL.
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Nov 12; 68(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 18508173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Prefrontal/accumbal catecholamine system processes emotionally driven attribution of motivational salience.
    Puglisi-Allegra S, Ventura R.
    Rev Neurosci; 2012 Nov 12; 23(5-6):509-26. PubMed ID: 23159865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.