These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

233 related items for PubMed ID: 25443856

  • 1. Exposures to conducted electrical weapons (including TASER® devices): how many and for how long are acceptable?
    Jauchem JR.
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60 Suppl 1():S116-29. PubMed ID: 25443856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Increased hematocrit after applications of conducted energy weapons (including TASER(®) devices) to Sus scrofa.
    Jauchem JR.
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S229-33. PubMed ID: 21198623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Pathophysiologic changes due to TASER® devices versus excited delirium: potential relevance to deaths-in-custody?
    Jauchem JR.
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2011 May; 18(4):145-53. PubMed ID: 21550562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. 40-Hz square-wave stimulation requires less energy to produce muscle contraction: compared with the TASER® X26 conducted energy weapon.
    Comeaux JA, Jauchem JR, Cox DD, Crane CC, D'Andrea JA.
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(4):1026-31. PubMed ID: 23682682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Physiological effects of the TASER C2 conducted energy weapon.
    Jauchem JR, Seaman RL, Klages CM.
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2009 Jul; 5(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 19598011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Acidosis, lactate, electrolytes, muscle enzymes, and other factors in the blood of Sus scrofa following repeated TASER exposures.
    Jauchem JR, Sherry CJ, Fines DA, Cook MC.
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Aug 10; 161(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 16289999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cardiac and skeletal muscle effects of electrical weapons : A review of human and animal studies.
    Kunz SN, Calkins H, Adamec J, Kroll MW.
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2018 Sep 10; 14(3):358-366. PubMed ID: 29956100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Physiologic effects of a new-generation conducted electrical weapon on human volunteers.
    Ho JD, Dawes DM, Chang RJ, Nelson RS, Miner JR.
    J Emerg Med; 2014 Mar 10; 46(3):428-35. PubMed ID: 24238599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. TASER® conducted electrical weapons: misconceptions in the scientific/medical and other literature.
    Jauchem JR.
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2015 Mar 10; 11(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 25549958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A TASER conducted electrical weapon with cardiac biomonitoring capability: Proof of concept and initial human trial.
    Stopyra JP, Ritter SI, Beatty J, Johnson JC, Kleiner DM, Winslow JE, Gardner AR, Bozeman WP.
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Oct 10; 43():48-52. PubMed ID: 27448029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Functioning and effectiveness of electronic control devices such as the TASER® M- and X-series: a review of the current literature.
    Kunz SN, Zinka B, Fieseler S, Graw M, Peschel O.
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Nov 10; 57(6):1591-4. PubMed ID: 22515413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The physiologic effects of a new generation conducted electrical weapon on human volunteers at rest.
    Ho JD, Dawes DM, Kunz SN, Klein LR, Driver BE, DeVries PA, Jones GA, Stang JL.
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2020 Sep 10; 16(3):406-414. PubMed ID: 32388670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Deaths in custody: are some due to electronic control devices (including TASER devices) or excited delirium?
    Jauchem JR.
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2010 Jan 10; 17(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 20083043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A comparison of three conducted electrical weapons in a surrogate swine cardiac safety model.
    Dawes DM, Ho JD, Halperin HR, Fink SJ, Driver BE, Klein LR.
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2021 Jan 10; 77():102088. PubMed ID: 33242742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Blood lactate concentration after exposure to conducted energy weapons (including TASER® devices): is it clinically relevant?
    Jauchem JR.
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2013 Sep 10; 9(3):386-94. PubMed ID: 23605975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Survival of anesthetized Sus scrofa after cycling (7-second on/3-second off) exposures to an electronic control device for 3 minutes.
    Jauchem JR, Seaman RL, Fines DA.
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2011 Jun 10; 32(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 21464698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [New studies question the cardiac safety of conducted electrical weapons].
    Thomsen JH, Kjærgaard J, Hassager C, Graff C, Hansen J, Worbech T, Jensen JH, Bro-Jeppesen J, Pehrson S.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2014 Jun 09; 176(24):1178-81. PubMed ID: 25765125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Human Health Risks of Conducted Electrical Weapon Exposure: A Systematic Review.
    Baliatsas C, Gerbecks J, Dückers MLA, Yzermans CJ.
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb 01; 4(2):e2037209. PubMed ID: 33576818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A comparative study of conducted electrical weapon incapacitation during a goal-directed task.
    Ho J, Dawes DM, Kunz SN, Satpathy R, Klein L, Driver B, Stang JL.
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2020 Dec 01; 16(4):613-621. PubMed ID: 32812174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Increased Hematocrit Due to Electrical-Waveform Exposures in Splenectomized Sus scrofa.
    Jauchem JR, Burns JM, Voorhees WB, Jirjis MB.
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jul 01; 64(4):1196-1202. PubMed ID: 30508303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.