These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

262 related items for PubMed ID: 25452631

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Tensile test and interface retention forces between wires and composites in lingual fixed retainers.
    Paolone MG, Kaitsas R, Obach P, Kaitsas V, Benedicenti S, Sorrenti E, Barberis F.
    Int Orthod; 2015 Jun; 13(2):210-220. PubMed ID: 26003122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Adhesive properties of bonded orthodontic retainers to enamel: stainless steel wire vs fiber-reinforced composites.
    Foek DL, Ozcan M, Krebs E, Sandham A.
    J Adhes Dent; 2009 Oct; 11(5):381-90. PubMed ID: 19841765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Multistranded wire bonded retainers: from start to success.
    Zachrisson BU.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Nov; 148(5):724-7. PubMed ID: 26522030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. "Clinical comparison of bond failure rate between two types of mandibular canine-canine bonded orthodontic retainers- a randomized clinical trial".
    Nagani NI, Ahmed I, Tanveer F, Khursheed HM, Farooqui WA.
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jun 29; 20(1):180. PubMed ID: 32600325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Clinical comparison of a multistranded wire and a direct-bonded polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite used for lingual retention.
    Rose E, Frucht S, Jonas IE.
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Sep 29; 33(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 12238688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Indirect vs direct bonding of mandibular fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial comparing placement time and failure over a 6-month period.
    Bovali E, Kiliaridis S, Cornelis MA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec 29; 146(6):701-8. PubMed ID: 25432250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of survival time between two types of orthodontic fixed retainer: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
    Salehi P, Zarif Najafi H, Roeinpeikar SM.
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep 11; 14():25. PubMed ID: 24326013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Antibacterial activity and debonding force of different lingual retainers bonded with conventional composite and nanoparticle containing composite: An in vitro study.
    Kotta M, Gorantla S, Muddada V, Lenka RR, Karri T, Kumar S, Tivanani M.
    J World Fed Orthod; 2020 Jun 11; 9(2):80-85. PubMed ID: 32672659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.