These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


567 related items for PubMed ID: 25476413

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Measurement of the hyperelastic properties of ex vivo brain tissue slices.
    Kaster T, Sack I, Samani A.
    J Biomech; 2011 Apr 07; 44(6):1158-63. PubMed ID: 21329927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Identification process based on shear wave propagation within a phantom using finite element modelling and magnetic resonance elastography.
    Leclerc GE, Charleux F, Ho Ba Tho MC, Bensamoun SF.
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015 Apr 07; 18(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 23947476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. An automatic differentiation-based gradient method for inversion of the shear wave equation in magnetic resonance elastography: specific application in fibrous soft tissues.
    Chatelin S, Charpentier I, Corbin N, Meylheuc L, Vappou J.
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jul 07; 61(13):5000-19. PubMed ID: 27300107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Method for characterizing viscoelasticity of human gluteal tissue.
    Then C, Vogl TJ, Silber G.
    J Biomech; 2012 Apr 30; 45(7):1252-8. PubMed ID: 22360834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Spherical indentation method for determining the constitutive parameters of hyperelastic soft materials.
    Zhang MG, Cao YP, Li GY, Feng XQ.
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2014 Jan 30; 13(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 23483348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Material characterization of in vivo and in vitro porcine brain using shear wave elasticity.
    Urbanczyk CA, Palmeri ML, Bass CR.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Mar 30; 41(3):713-23. PubMed ID: 25683220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. An Inverse Method to Determine Arterial Stiffness with Guided Axial Waves.
    Li GY, He Q, Jia L, He P, Luo J, Cao Y.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Feb 30; 43(2):505-516. PubMed ID: 27908486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Rescaled Local Interaction Simulation Approach for Shear Wave Propagation Modelling in Magnetic Resonance Elastography.
    Hashemiyan Z, Packo P, Staszewski WJ, Uhl T.
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2016 Feb 30; 2016():9343017. PubMed ID: 26884808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Comparison of four different techniques to evaluate the elastic properties of phantom in elastography: is there a gold standard?
    Oudry J, Lynch T, Vappou J, Sandrin L, Miette V.
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Oct 07; 59(19):5775-93. PubMed ID: 25208061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 29.