These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

170 related items for PubMed ID: 25480078

  • 1. Effects of masker type, sentence context, and listener age on speech recognition performance in 1-back listening tasks.
    Schurman J, Brungart D, Gordon-Salant S.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3337. PubMed ID: 25480078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V, Molis MR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL, Doherty KA.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Apr; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing.
    Gordon-Salant S, Cole SS.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Apr; 37(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 27232071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH, Humes LE, Amos NE, Strauser LE.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Masked Sentence Recognition in Children, Young Adults, and Older Adults: Age-Dependent Effects of Semantic Context and Masker Type.
    Buss E, Hodge SE, Calandruccio L, Leibold LJ, Grose JH.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Jun; 40(5):1117-1126. PubMed ID: 30601213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T, Laugesen S, Jensen NS, Kragelund L.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
    Zekveld AA, Rudner M, Johnsrude IS, Rönnberg J.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2225-34. PubMed ID: 23967952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Auditory Working Memory Explains Variance in Speech Recognition in Older Listeners Under Adverse Listening Conditions.
    Kim S, Choi I, Schwalje AT, Kim K, Lee JH.
    Clin Interv Aging; 2020 Sep; 15():395-406. PubMed ID: 32231429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Masking release and modulation interference in cochlear implant and simulation listeners.
    Jin SH, Nie Y, Nelson P.
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):135-46. PubMed ID: 23800809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.