These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1183 related items for PubMed ID: 25514796

  • 1. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM, Schuchman G, Bernstein JG.
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Preserved acoustic hearing in cochlear implantation improves speech perception.
    Sheffield SW, Jahn K, Gifford RH.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 25690775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T, Fastl H, Baumann U.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Feb; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Longitudinal outcomes of cochlear implantation and bimodal hearing in a large group of adults: A multicenter clinical study.
    Kelsall D, Lupo J, Biever A.
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2021 Feb; 42(1):102773. PubMed ID: 33161258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Sheffield BM, Schuchman G, Bernstein JGW.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Feb; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Fundamental frequency information for speech recognition via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant in one ear and hearing aid in the other.
    Shpak T, Most T, Luntz M.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Feb; 35(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 24141594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
    Brown CJ, Jeon EK, Chiou LK, Kirby B, Karsten SA, Turner CW, Abbas PJ.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Feb; 36(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26295607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Criteria for Selecting an Optimal Device for the Contralateral Ear of Children with a Unilateral Cochlear Implant.
    Jeong SW, Kang MY, Kim LS.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2015 Feb; 20(5):314-21. PubMed ID: 26277845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Visual Temporal Acuity Is Related to Auditory Speech Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jahn KN, Stevenson RA, Wallace MT.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Feb; 38(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 27764001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
    Gifford RH, Stecker GC.
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M, Grayden D, Dowell RC, Lawrence D.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effects of frequency compression hearing aids for unilaterally implanted children with acoustically amplified residual hearing in the nonimplanted ear.
    Park LR, Teagle HF, Buss E, Roush PA, Buchman CA.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Apr; 33(4):e1-e12. PubMed ID: 22531574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B, Dietz M, Hohmann V, Jürgens T.
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec 30; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant.
    Lenarz T, James C, Cuda D, Fitzgerald O'Connor A, Frachet B, Frijns JH, Klenzner T, Laszig R, Manrique M, Marx M, Merkus P, Mylanus EA, Offeciers E, Pesch J, Ramos-Macias A, Robier A, Sterkers O, Uziel A.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec 30; 52(12):838-48. PubMed ID: 23992489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Auditory Discrimination of Lexical Stress Patterns in Hearing-Impaired Infants with Cochlear Implants Compared with Normal Hearing: Influence of Acoustic Cues and Listening Experience to the Ambient Language.
    Segal O, Houston D, Kishon-Rabin L.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Dec 30; 37(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 26627470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A, Berthommier F, Leybaert J.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Dec 30; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 60.