These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

292 related items for PubMed ID: 25532643

  • 1. Repeatability and reproducibility of a new optical biometer in normal and keratoconic eyes.
    Yağcı R, Güler E, Kulak AE, Erdoğan BD, Balcı M, Hepşen İF.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Jan; 41(1):171-7. PubMed ID: 25532643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements With a Dual Scheimpflug Placido Corneal Topographer and a New Partial Coherence Interferometer in Keratoconic Eyes.
    Yağcı R, Kulak AE, Güler E, Tenlik A, Gürağaç FB, Hepşen İF.
    Cornea; 2015 Sep; 34(9):1012-8. PubMed ID: 26203742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence interferometer.
    Huang J, Savini G, Wu F, Yu X, Yang J, Yu A, Yu Y, Wang Q.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2233-41. PubMed ID: 26703300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Intrasubject repeatability in keratoconus-eye measurements obtained with a new Scheimpflug photography-based system.
    Montalbán R, Alió JL, Javaloy J, Piñero DP.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 39(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 23218818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Validation of keratometric measurements obtained with an intraoperative image-guided system: intra-session repeatability and interchangeability with an optical biometer.
    Ruiz-Belda C, Rodrigo F, Piñero DP.
    Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Mar; 101(2):200-205. PubMed ID: 29090488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of a new optical biometry device for measurements of ocular components and its comparison with IOLMaster.
    Huang J, Savini G, Li J, Lu W, Wu F, Wang J, Li Y, Feng Y, Wang Q.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 98(9):1277-81. PubMed ID: 24795336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparative analysis of corneal measurements obtained from a Scheimpflug camera and an integrated Placido-optical coherence tomography device in normal and keratoconic eyes.
    Viswanathan D, Kumar NL, Males JJ, Graham SL.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 93(6):e488-94. PubMed ID: 25495530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of a new optical biometry with an optical low-coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry.
    Güler E, Kulak AE, Totan Y, Yuvarlak A, Hepşen İF.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Oct; 39(5):336-41. PubMed ID: 27344235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of the repeatability of the Lenstar and comparison with two other non-contact biometric devices in myopes.
    Zhao J, Chen Z, Zhou Z, Ding L, Zhou X.
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 22943766
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Repeatability and reproducibility of biometry and keratometry measurements using a noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer and keratometer.
    Shammas HJ, Hoffer KJ.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jan; 153(1):55-61.e2. PubMed ID: 21907967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.