These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
307 related items for PubMed ID: 25539569
1. Does the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) accurately map visual field loss attributed to vigabatrin? Conway ML, Hosking SL, Zhu H, Cubbidge RP. BMC Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec 23; 14():166. PubMed ID: 25539569 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies. Artes PH, Iwase A, Ohno Y, Kitazawa Y, Chauhan BC. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug 23; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul 23; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of threshold estimation and learning effect of two perimetric strategies, SITA Fast and CLIP, in damaged visual fields. Capris P, Autuori S, Capris E, Papadia M. Eur J Ophthalmol; 2008 Aug 23; 18(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 18320509 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc. Sakata LM, Deleon-Ortega J, Arthur SN, Monheit BE, Girkin CA. Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar 23; 125(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 17353404 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of 30-2 Standard and Fast programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for perimetry in patients with intracranial tumors. Singh MD, Jain K. Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov 23; 65(11):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 29133651 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]