These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

349 related items for PubMed ID: 25557006

  • 1. Comparison of the accuracy of a 3-dimensional virtual method and the conventional method for transferring the maxillary cast to a virtual articulator.
    Solaberrieta E, Mínguez R, Barrenetxea L, Otegi JR, Szentpétery A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 25557006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of a conventional and virtual occlusal record.
    Solaberrieta E, Otegi JR, Goicoechea N, Brizuela A, Pradies G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 25858220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of an improved orthognathic articulator system: 1. Accuracy of cast orientation.
    Paul PE, Barbenel JC, Walker FS, Khambay BS, Moos KF, Ayoub AF.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 22047955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant.
    Nazir N, Sujesh M, Kumar R, Sreenivas P.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012 Feb; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. An evaluation of face-bow transfer for the planning of orthognathic surgery.
    Zizelmann C, Hammer B, Gellrich NC, Schwestka-Polly R, Rana M, Bucher P.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 70(8):1944-50. PubMed ID: 22079061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
    Delong R, Ko CC, Anderson GC, Hodges JS, Douglas WH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Determining the requirements, section quantity, and dimension of the virtual occlusal record.
    Solaberrieta E, Arias A, Brizuela A, Garikano X, Pradies G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jan; 115(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 26386482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Direct transfer of the position of digitized casts to a virtual articulator.
    Solaberrieta E, Mínguez R, Barrenetxea L, Etxaniz O.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jun; 109(6):411-4. PubMed ID: 23763787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Determining the accuracy of articulator interchangeability and hinge axis reproducibility.
    Hatzi P, Millstein P, Maya A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):236-45. PubMed ID: 11264930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of an improved orthognathic articulator system. 2. Accuracy of occlusal wafers.
    Paul PE, Barbenel JC, Walker FS, Khambay BS, Moos KF, Ayoub AF.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 22047954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Accuracy of transferring analog dental casts to a virtual articulator.
    Úry E, Fornai C, Weber GW.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):305-313. PubMed ID: 31227241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The Accuracy of Transferring Casts in Maximal Intercuspal Position to a Virtual Articulator.
    He M, Ding Q, Li L, Yang G, Zhao Y, Sun Y, Zhang L.
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):326-332. PubMed ID: 34196456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of the Kois Dento-Facial Analyzer System with an earbow for mounting a maxillary cast.
    Lux LH, Thompson GA, Waliszewski KJ, Ziebert GJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):432-9. PubMed ID: 25979448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Virtual facebow technique.
    Solaberrieta E, Garmendia A, Minguez R, Brizuela A, Pradies G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Dec; 114(6):751-5. PubMed ID: 26372628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Dimensional accuracy of optical bite registration in single and multiple unit restorations.
    Iwaki Y, Wakabayashi N, Igarashi Y.
    Oper Dent; 2013 Dec; 38(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 23092147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A comparison of facebow and dentofacial analyzer mountings.
    Galanis A, Ali M, Belles D, Koeppen RG.
    Tex Dent J; 2013 Oct; 130(10):1047-53. PubMed ID: 24354168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. An integrated orthognathic surgery system for virtual planning and image-guided transfer without intermediate splint.
    Kim DS, Woo SY, Yang HJ, Huh KH, Lee SS, Heo MS, Choi SC, Hwang SJ, Yi WJ.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):2010-7. PubMed ID: 25458350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Digitizing the Facebow: A Clinician/Technician Communication Tool.
    Kalman L, Chrapka J, Joseph Y.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016 Dec; 29(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 26757326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planning: 3D virtual articulator: technical note.
    Ghanai S, Marmulla R, Wiechnik J, Mühling J, Kotrikova B.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 39(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 20005674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.