These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
269 related items for PubMed ID: 25575203
1. Maxillary and Mandibular Rehabilitation in the Esthetic Zone Using a Digital Impression Technique and CAD/CAM-fabricated Prostheses: A Multidisciplinary Clinical Report. Abdel-Azim T, Zandinejad A, Metz M, Morton D. Oper Dent; 2015; 40(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 25575203 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Virtually designed and CAD/CAM-fabricated lithium disilicate prostheses for an esthetic maxillary rehabilitation: a senior dental student clinical report. Zandinejad A, Metz M, Stevens P, Lin WS, Morton D. J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 25682528 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A fully digital approach to replicate functional and aesthetic parameters in implant-supported full-arch rehabilitation. Monaco C, Ragazzini N, Scheda L, Evangelisti E. J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):383-385. PubMed ID: 29191608 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Integrating a facial scan, virtual smile design, and 3D virtual patient for treatment with CAD-CAM ceramic veneers: A clinical report. Lin WS, Harris BT, Phasuk K, Llop DR, Morton D. J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):200-205. PubMed ID: 28619358 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of a scannable impression coping and digital impression technique to fabricate a customized anatomic abutment and zirconia restoration in the esthetic zone. Lin WS, Harris BT, Morton D. J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 23522368 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An In Vitro Comparison of the Marginal Adaptation Accuracy of CAD/CAM Restorations Using Different Impression Systems. Shembesh M, Ali A, Finkelman M, Weber HP, Zandparsa R. J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):581-586. PubMed ID: 26855068 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated from conventional and digital impressions assessed with micro-CT. Kim JH, Jeong JH, Lee JH, Cho HW. J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):551-557. PubMed ID: 27422237 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Trial insertion procedure for milled lithium disilicate restorations in the precrystallized state. Lin WS, Harris BT, Morton D. J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jan; 107(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 22230917 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Loss of tooth structure associated with preparation for two monolithic CAD-CAM complete coverage restorations. Sadid-Zadeh R, Farsaii A, Goodarzi A, Davis EL. J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):403-408. PubMed ID: 29724561 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. From orthodontic treatment plan to ultrathin no-prep CAD/CAM temporary veneers. Patroni S, Cocconi R. Int J Esthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 12(4):504-522. PubMed ID: 28983534 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Diagnossis and treatment of complicated anterior teeth esthetic defects by combination of whole-process digital esthetic rehabilitation with periodontic surgery]. Li Z, Liu YS, Ye HQ, Liu YS, Hu WJ, Zhou YS. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Feb 18; 49(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 28203007 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital transition: the collaboration between dentists and laboratory technicians on CAD/CAM restorations. Touchstone A, Nieting T, Ulmer N. J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Jun 18; 141 Suppl 2():15S-9S. PubMed ID: 20516110 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. Anadioti E, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, Holloway JA, Denry I, Thomas GW, Qian F. J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec 18; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Systematic development of esthetics and function in a young patient with maxillary dental aplasia. Edelhoff D, Prandtner O, Saeidi Pour R, Wichelhaus A, Liebermann A. J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Jul 08; 29(4):247-255. PubMed ID: 28681501 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. CAD/CAM and lithium disilicate: an anterior esthetic case study. Zimmermann R, Seitz S, Evans J, Bonner J. Tex Dent J; 2013 Feb 08; 130(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 23930452 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of trial restorations from virtual planning: A comparison of two fabrication techniques. Ortensi L, Lo Castro E, Rapisarda E, Pedullà E. J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar 08; 127(3):425-429. PubMed ID: 33317829 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal adaptation of CAD-CAM onlays: Influence of preparation design and impression technique. Lima FF, Neto CF, Rubo JH, Santos GC, Moraes Coelho Santos MJ. J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep 08; 120(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 29551386 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression. Su TS, Sun J. J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep 08; 116(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 27061628 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]