These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

534 related items for PubMed ID: 25578536

  • 1. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening improves implantation and live birth in women age 40 through 43.
    Lee HL, McCulloh DH, Hodes-Wertz B, Adler A, McCaffrey C, Grifo JA.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Mar; 32(3):435-44. PubMed ID: 25578536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Preimplantation genetic screening: who benefits?
    Kang HJ, Melnick AP, Stewart JD, Xu K, Rosenwaks Z.
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep 01; 106(3):597-602. PubMed ID: 27143516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Differences in pregnancy outcomes in donor egg frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles following preimplantation genetic screening (PGS): a single center retrospective study.
    Coates A, Bankowski BJ, Kung A, Griffin DK, Munne S.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Jan 01; 34(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 27853913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts.
    Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Elliott T, Wright G, Nagy ZP, Ubaldi FM.
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun 01; 29(6):1173-81. PubMed ID: 24578475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Intent to treat analysis of in vitro fertilization and preimplantation genetic screening versus expectant management in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Murugappan G, Shahine LK, Perfetto CO, Hickok LR, Lathi RB.
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug 01; 31(8):1668-74. PubMed ID: 27278003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening: a reanalysis of United States assisted reproductive technology data 2011-2012.
    Kushnir VA, Darmon SK, Albertini DF, Barad DH, Gleicher N.
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul 01; 106(1):75-79. PubMed ID: 26952783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Hatching status before embryo transfer is not correlated with implantation rate in chromosomally screened blastocysts.
    Rodriguez-Purata J, Gingold J, Lee J, Whitehouse M, Slifkin R, Briton-Jones C, Copperman A, Sandler B.
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov 01; 31(11):2458-2470. PubMed ID: 27619770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Why do euploid embryos miscarry? A case-control study comparing the rate of aneuploidy within presumed euploid embryos that resulted in miscarriage or live birth using next-generation sequencing.
    Maxwell SM, Colls P, Hodes-Wertz B, McCulloh DH, McCaffrey C, Wells D, Munné S, Grifo JA.
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Nov 01; 106(6):1414-1419.e5. PubMed ID: 27692437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Reduction of multiple pregnancies in the advanced maternal age population after implementation of an elective single embryo transfer policy coupled with enhanced embryo selection: pre- and post-intervention study.
    Ubaldi FM, Capalbo A, Colamaria S, Ferrero S, Maggiulli R, Vajta G, Sapienza F, Cimadomo D, Giuliani M, Gravotta E, Vaiarelli A, Rienzi L.
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Sep 01; 30(9):2097-106. PubMed ID: 26150408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Impact of blastocyst biopsy and comprehensive chromosome screening technology on preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
    Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, García-Velasco JA.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Mar 01; 30(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 25599824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Randomized comparison of next-generation sequencing and array comparative genomic hybridization for preimplantation genetic screening: a pilot study.
    Yang Z, Lin J, Zhang J, Fong WI, Li P, Zhao R, Liu X, Podevin W, Kuang Y, Liu J.
    BMC Med Genomics; 2015 Jun 23; 8():30. PubMed ID: 26100406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Analysis of clinical outcomes of different embryo stage biopsy in array comparative genomic hybridization based preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening].
    Shen JD, Wu W, Shu L, Cai LL, Xie JZ, Ma L, Sun XP, Cui YG, Liu JY.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Dec 25; 52(12):828-834. PubMed ID: 29325267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Preimplantation genetic screening for abnormal number of chromosomes (aneuploidies) in in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
    Twisk M, Mastenbroek S, van Wely M, Heineman MJ, Van der Veen F, Repping S.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Jan 25; (1):CD005291. PubMed ID: 16437524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Is the hypothesis of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) still supportable? A review.
    Gleicher N, Orvieto R.
    J Ovarian Res; 2017 Mar 27; 10(1):21. PubMed ID: 28347334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Initial maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin levels in pregnancies achieved after assisted reproductive technology are higher after preimplantation genetic screening and after frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort.
    Hobeika E, Singh S, Malik S, Knochenhauer ES, Traub ML.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Oct 27; 34(10):1333-1340. PubMed ID: 28639180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Discrepant diagnosis rate of array comparative genomic hybridization in thawed euploid blastocysts.
    Tiegs AW, Hodes-Wertz B, McCulloh DH, Munné S, Grifo JA.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Jul 27; 33(7):893-7. PubMed ID: 26984233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.