These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
903 related items for PubMed ID: 25599824
21. Mitochondrial DNA quantification as a tool for embryo viability assessment: retrospective analysis of data from single euploid blastocyst transfers. Ravichandran K, McCaffrey C, Grifo J, Morales A, Perloe M, Munne S, Wells D, Fragouli E. Hum Reprod; 2017 Jun 01; 32(6):1282-1292. PubMed ID: 28387858 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Reduction of multiple pregnancies in the advanced maternal age population after implementation of an elective single embryo transfer policy coupled with enhanced embryo selection: pre- and post-intervention study. Ubaldi FM, Capalbo A, Colamaria S, Ferrero S, Maggiulli R, Vajta G, Sapienza F, Cimadomo D, Giuliani M, Gravotta E, Vaiarelli A, Rienzi L. Hum Reprod; 2015 Sep 01; 30(9):2097-106. PubMed ID: 26150408 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of multinucleated blastomeres on embryo developmental competence, morphokinetics, and aneuploidy. Balakier H, Sojecki A, Motamedi G, Librach C. Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep 01; 106(3):608-614.e2. PubMed ID: 27206619 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Higher rates of aneuploidy in blastocysts and higher risk of no embryo transfer in recurrent pregnancy loss patients with diminished ovarian reserve undergoing in vitro fertilization. Shahine LK, Marshall L, Lamb JD, Hickok LR. Fertil Steril; 2016 Oct 01; 106(5):1124-1128. PubMed ID: 27371114 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Should every embryo undergo preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy? A review of the modern approach to in vitro fertilization. Maxwell SM, Grifo JA. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Nov 01; 53():38-47. PubMed ID: 30146380 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening improves implantation and live birth in women age 40 through 43. Lee HL, McCulloh DH, Hodes-Wertz B, Adler A, McCaffrey C, Grifo JA. J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Mar 01; 32(3):435-44. PubMed ID: 25578536 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Differences in pregnancy outcomes in donor egg frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles following preimplantation genetic screening (PGS): a single center retrospective study. Coates A, Bankowski BJ, Kung A, Griffin DK, Munne S. J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Jan 01; 34(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 27853913 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Confirmation rates of array-CGH in day-3 embryo and blastocyst biopsies for preimplantation genetic screening. Mir P, Mateu E, Mercader A, Herrer R, Rodrigo L, Vera M, Peinado V, Milán-Sánchez M, Campos-Galindo I, García-Herrero S, Simón C, Rubio C. J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Jan 01; 33(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 26547204 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Selection of competent blastocysts for transfer by combining time-lapse monitoring and array CGH testing for patients undergoing preimplantation genetic screening: a prospective study with sibling oocytes. Yang Z, Zhang J, Salem SA, Liu X, Kuang Y, Salem RD, Liu J. BMC Med Genomics; 2014 Jun 22; 7():38. PubMed ID: 24954518 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Lessons from elective in vitro fertilization (IVF) in, principally, non-infertile women. Gleicher N, Kim A, Weghofer A, Barad DH. Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2012 Jun 20; 10():48. PubMed ID: 22716082 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening by array comparative genomic hybridisation: experience of more than 100 cases in a single centre. Chow JF, Yeung WS, Lee VC, Lau EY, Ho PC, Ng EH. Hong Kong Med J; 2017 Apr 20; 23(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 28211357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): status and future challenges. Sciorio R, Tramontano L, Catt J. Gynecol Endocrinol; 2020 Jan 20; 36(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 31317806 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The why, the how and the when of PGS 2.0: current practices and expert opinions of fertility specialists, molecular biologists, and embryologists. Sermon K, Capalbo A, Cohen J, Coonen E, De Rycke M, De Vos A, Delhanty J, Fiorentino F, Gleicher N, Griesinger G, Grifo J, Handyside A, Harper J, Kokkali G, Mastenbroek S, Meldrum D, Meseguer M, Montag M, Munné S, Rienzi L, Rubio C, Scott K, Scott R, Simon C, Swain J, Treff N, Ubaldi F, Vassena R, Vermeesch JR, Verpoest W, Wells D, Geraedts J. Mol Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug 20; 22(8):845-57. PubMed ID: 27256483 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]