These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
379 related items for PubMed ID: 25618098
1. Relationship between listeners' nonnative speech recognition and categorization abilities. Atagi E, Bent T. J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):EL44-50. PubMed ID: 25618098 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception. Peng ZE, Wang LM. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr 15; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Nonnative Accent Discrimination with Words and Sentences. Atagi E, Bent T. Phonetica; 2017 Apr 15; 74(3):173-191. PubMed ID: 28268232 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Accent Intelligibility Differences in Noise Across Native and Nonnative Accents: Effects of Talker-Listener Pairing at Acoustic-Phonetic and Lexical Levels. Stringer L, Iverson P. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jul 15; 62(7):2213-2226. PubMed ID: 31251681 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Second-language experience and speech-in-noise recognition: effects of talker-listener accent similarity. Pinet M, Iverson P, Huckvale M. J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep 15; 130(3):1653-62. PubMed ID: 21895102 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of noise, reverberation and foreign accent on native and non-native listeners' performance of English speech comprehension. Peng ZE, Wang LM. J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May 15; 139(5):2772. PubMed ID: 27250170 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience. Pinet M, Iverson P. J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep 15; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Intelligibility of Noise-Adapted and Clear Speech in Energetic and Informational Maskers for Native and Nonnative Listeners. Meemann K, Smiljanić R. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Apr 04; 65(4):1263-1281. PubMed ID: 35235410 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of noise and talker intelligibility on judgments of accentedness. Gittleman S, Van Engen KJ. J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May 04; 143(5):3138. PubMed ID: 29857746 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report. Tamati TN, Gilbert JL, Pisoni DB. J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan 04; 24(7):616-34. PubMed ID: 24047949 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Auditory free classification of nonnative speech. Atagi E, Bent T. J Phon; 2013 Nov 01; 41(6):. PubMed ID: 24363470 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Contribution of linguistic variables to bilingual listeners' perception of degraded English sentences. Shi LF. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Feb 01; 55(1):219-34. PubMed ID: 22199200 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Categorization of second language accents by bilingual and multilingual listeners. Georgiou GP. Br J Dev Psychol; 2024 Sep 01; 42(3):425-438. PubMed ID: 38934209 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]