These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

376 related items for PubMed ID: 25625336

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Kielland's forceps. From controversy to consensus?
    Nash Z, Nathan B, Mascarenhas L.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jan; 94(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 25233861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with pregnancies delivering by non-rotational forceps.
    Giacchino T, Karkia R, Zhang W, Ahmed H, Akolekar R.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Apr; 42(3):379-384. PubMed ID: 34030603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The place of Kielland's forceps in reducing caesarean section rates.
    Balchandra P, Marsh F, Landon C.
    Pract Midwife; 2015 Apr; 18(4):23-5. PubMed ID: 26328462
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study.
    Bahl R, Van de Venne M, Macleod M, Strachan B, Murphy DJ.
    BJOG; 2013 Nov; 120(12):1526-32. PubMed ID: 23924292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Four-dimensional sonographic evaluation of avulsion of the levator ani according to delivery mode.
    Cassadó Garriga J, Pessarrodona Isern A, Espuña Pons M, Duran Retamal M, Felgueroso Fabrega A, Rodriguez Carballeira M, Jordà Santamaria I.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Dec; 38(6):701-6. PubMed ID: 21837763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of maternal and fetal effects of vacuum extraction with forceps or cesarean deliveries.
    Greis JB, Bieniarz J, Scommegna A.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 May; 57(5):571-7. PubMed ID: 7219906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cesarean section versus forceps-assisted vaginal birth: it's time to include pelvic injury in the risk-benefit equation.
    Farrell SA.
    CMAJ; 2002 Feb 05; 166(3):337-8. PubMed ID: 11868644
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with rotational ventouse or second stage caesarean section deliveries.
    Giacchino T, Karkia R, Zhang W, Beta J, Ahmed H, Akolekar R.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Nov 05; 254():175-180. PubMed ID: 32987337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.