These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

338 related items for PubMed ID: 25643936

  • 1. Biomechanical comparison of effects of the Dynesys and Coflex dynamic stabilization systems on range of motion and loading characteristics in the lumbar spine: a finite element study.
    Kulduk A, Altun NS, Senkoylu A.
    Int J Med Robot; 2015 Dec; 11(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 25643936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System)--a finite element analysis.
    Chen CS, Huang CH, Shih SL.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Apr 09; 16():81. PubMed ID: 25880231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
    Rohlmann A, Burra NK, Zander T, Bergmann G.
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug 09; 16(8):1223-31. PubMed ID: 17206401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Adjacent segment mobility after rigid and semirigid instrumentation of the lumbar spine.
    Cakir B, Carazzo C, Schmidt R, Mattes T, Reichel H, Käfer W.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May 20; 34(12):1287-91. PubMed ID: 19455004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Biomechanical characteristics analysis on discs with coflex fixation on the different segments of lower lumbar spine].
    Wu XL, Wu LJ, Zheng RM, Wang JS, Xu HZ, Zhou Y, Wu AM.
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2014 Nov 20; 27(11):938-42. PubMed ID: 25577918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Single-Level Rigid Fixation Combined with Coflex: A Biomechanical Study.
    Che W, Chen Q, Ma YQ, Jiang YQ, Yuan W, Zhou XG, Li XL, Dong J.
    Med Sci Monit; 2016 Mar 29; 22():1022-7. PubMed ID: 27021044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of the biomechanical effect of pedicle-based dynamic stabilization: a study using finite element analysis.
    Jahng TA, Kim YE, Moon KY.
    Spine J; 2013 Jan 29; 13(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 23266148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Application of an interspinous process device after minimally invasive lumbar decompression could lead to stress redistribution at the pars interarticularis: a finite element analysis.
    Lo HJ, Chen CS, Chen HM, Yang SW.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 May 15; 20(1):213. PubMed ID: 31092237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.